MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ahjo.2026.100930

Медицинская библиотека · American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026

Ticagrelor versus prasugrel following PCI in acute coronary syndromes and high-risk coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of one-year randomized trial outcomes.

Gbreel Mohamed Ibrahim, Badran Ahmed Samy, Robinson Daniel, Ebeid Islam, Hassan Marwa, Abdelrahman Abdelhakim A, Bodanowitz Jonas, Valenta Stephan, Valenta Christin, Kochev Plamen, Ortak Jasmin, Ince Hüseyin, Balata Mahmoud

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend potent P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention. Whether ticagrelor- or prasugrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) provides superior clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, particularly across acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) populations.

METHODS

We searched databases for randomized controlled trials comparing ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based DAPT in patients with CAD undergoing PCI with 1-year follow-up. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Sensitivity analyses were performed in ACS populations.

RESULTS

Three trials randomized a total of 7048 patients. In the primary analysis, prasugrel-based therapy was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in MACE compared with ticagrelor-based therapy (HR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.67-1.03; p = 0.09). All-cause mortality (HR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.68-1.08; p = 0.20), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.72-1.21; p = 0.60), myocardial infarction (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.56-1.14; p = 0.22), stroke (HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.63-1.73; p = 0.87), stent thrombosis (HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.45-1.11; p = 0.13), and major bleeding (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.68-1.17; p = 0.41) were comparable between strategies. ACS-restricted sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent findings across all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ACS and high-risk CAD undergoing PCI, current randomized evidence does not establish conclusive superiority between ticagrelor- and prasugrel-based DAPT for 1-year ischemic or bleeding endpoints.

Для цитирования: Gbreel Mohamed Ibrahim, Badran Ahmed Samy, Robinson Daniel, Ebeid Islam, Hassan Marwa, Abdelrahman Abdelhakim A, Bodanowitz Jonas, Valenta Stephan, Valenta Christin, Kochev Plamen, Ortak Jasmin, Ince Hüseyin, Balata Mahmoud. Ticagrelor versus prasugrel following PCI in acute coronary syndromes and high-risk coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of one-year randomized trial outcomes.. American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2026.100930.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.