International urogynecology journal · 2026
Developing a Risk-Adjustment Model for Stress Urinary Incontinence Procedures Using Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry Data.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Johnson Stanley, Honardoost Mohammad Amin, Ahern Susannah, Ruseckaite Rasa, Whale Rhiannon, Matthews Bayley, Bach Fiona, Edwards Ailsa Wilson, Earnest Arul
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Surgical outcomes for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) procedures are influenced by factors beyond the surgeon's control. Using Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry data, this study is aimed at developing a risk-adjustment model for equitable benchmarking of clinician-reported outcomes for female SUI procedures.
METHODS: Logistic regression was used to create multivariate models for clinician-reported outcomes of primary SUI procedures. Risk factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), diabetic status, and symptoms of bladder disease were selected for adjustment after consultation with clinicians. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to ensure the robustness of the primary model.
RESULTS: The multivariate model for clinician-reported improvement indicated that age over 80 years (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.55 to 6.16, p = 0.001), BMI within the obese range (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.03 to 6.98, p = 0.044), and a history of overactive bladder (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.63, p = 0.010) were significantly associated with poorer outcomes. The model showed an acceptable fit, with an area under the curve of 68.38%.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinician-reported outcomes for primary SUI procedures in women are significantly affected by age, BMI and pre-existing bladder disease. This model can be used to statistically adjust for differences in case-mix across different clinical facilities, allowing for unbiased and equitable benchmarking of surgical outcomes.
METHODS: Logistic regression was used to create multivariate models for clinician-reported outcomes of primary SUI procedures. Risk factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), diabetic status, and symptoms of bladder disease were selected for adjustment after consultation with clinicians. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to ensure the robustness of the primary model.
RESULTS: The multivariate model for clinician-reported improvement indicated that age over 80 years (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.55 to 6.16, p = 0.001), BMI within the obese range (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.03 to 6.98, p = 0.044), and a history of overactive bladder (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.63, p = 0.010) were significantly associated with poorer outcomes. The model showed an acceptable fit, with an area under the curve of 68.38%.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinician-reported outcomes for primary SUI procedures in women are significantly affected by age, BMI and pre-existing bladder disease. This model can be used to statistically adjust for differences in case-mix across different clinical facilities, allowing for unbiased and equitable benchmarking of surgical outcomes.