Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2026
Agentic Automation of BT-RADS Scoring Using an End-to-End System for Standardized Glioma Follow-up Assessment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jabal Mohamed Sobhi, Zhang Jikai, LaBella Dominic, Houk Jessica L, Zhang Dylan, Rudie Jeffrey D, Mazurowski Maciej A, Magudia Kirti, Calabrese Evan
Аннотация
The Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) standardizes posttreatment MRI response assessment in patients with diffuse gliomas but requires complex integration of imaging trends, medication effects, and radiation timing. An end-to-end multiagent large language model and convolutional neural network system for automated BTRADS classification was developed and evaluated. Five hundred nine consecutive posttreatment glioma MRI examinations (March 2017-July 2021) from a single center were retrospectively evaluated. An extractor agent identified clinical variables from notes using gpt-oss (OpenAI, 20-billion parameters). A scorer agent applied BTRADS decision logic integrating these with quantitative volumetrics. System accuracy was compared against initial assessments, using expert annotation as the reference standard. Four hundred ninety-two examinations were evaluable. Overall system accuracy was 76.0% (374/492) versus 57.5% (283/492) for initial assessments, an absolute difference of +18.5 percentage points (P < .001). Cohen kappa between the system and the reference standard was 0.71. The system achieved high sensitivity in context-dependent categories (BT-1b; 100%; BT-1a, 92.7%; BT-3a, 87.5%) and moderate sensitivity for threshold-dependent categories (BT-3c, 74.8%; BT-2, 69.2%; BT-4, 69.3%; BT-3b, 57.1%). The BT-4 positive predictive value was 92.9%. These results support further evaluation of this system as a clinical decision-support tool, with local open-weight inference preserving data privacy.