Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
[Clinical Decision Unit in the emergency department-a systems analysis of a clinical decision model for hospital admission management].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Köhnke Richard, Pinkernell Linus, Rovas Alexandros, de Goede Eva, Dany Katharina, Jahn-Frank Vitali, Mühlenkamp Sophia, Liebenau Esra, Menzen Niklas, Pavenstädt Hermann, Möddel Gabriel, Schmidt-Pogoda Antje, Bernhard Michael, Kümpers Philipp
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Observation units are an established component of modern emergency departments. However, limited data are available on the operational, governance, and staffing concepts underlying their performance.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the Clinical Decision Unit model of a university interdisciplinary emergency department.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all adult nontrauma patients treated in 2024. Organizational structure, care pathways, resource utilization, and outcomes were analyzed. A simulation estimated additional inpatient bed demand in a hypothetical scenario without the Clinical Decision Unit model.
RESULTS: Among 17,001 patients, 10,327 (60.7%) received inpatient management within the Clinical Decision Unit model. Of these, 3880 (37.6%) completed their care within the emergency department, whereas 6447 (62.4%) were transferred to an inpatient specialty ward. Patients receiving definitive care within the emergency department remained for a median of 9.6 h and required comparable diagnostic and therapeutic resources. In the hypothetical scenario without the Clinical Decision Unit model, an additional 5485 bed-days would have been required on inpatient wards; after accounting for the bed capacity required within the emergency department, the net capacity difference was 4191 bed-days, equivalent to a mean of 11.5 beds.
CONCLUSION: A structured Clinical Decision Unit model can complete inpatient care within the emergency department and preserve inpatient capacity. Experienced interprofessional teams, clear clinical decision-making responsibility, and appropriate emergency care infrastructure are essential prerequisites.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the Clinical Decision Unit model of a university interdisciplinary emergency department.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all adult nontrauma patients treated in 2024. Organizational structure, care pathways, resource utilization, and outcomes were analyzed. A simulation estimated additional inpatient bed demand in a hypothetical scenario without the Clinical Decision Unit model.
RESULTS: Among 17,001 patients, 10,327 (60.7%) received inpatient management within the Clinical Decision Unit model. Of these, 3880 (37.6%) completed their care within the emergency department, whereas 6447 (62.4%) were transferred to an inpatient specialty ward. Patients receiving definitive care within the emergency department remained for a median of 9.6 h and required comparable diagnostic and therapeutic resources. In the hypothetical scenario without the Clinical Decision Unit model, an additional 5485 bed-days would have been required on inpatient wards; after accounting for the bed capacity required within the emergency department, the net capacity difference was 4191 bed-days, equivalent to a mean of 11.5 beds.
CONCLUSION: A structured Clinical Decision Unit model can complete inpatient care within the emergency department and preserve inpatient capacity. Experienced interprofessional teams, clear clinical decision-making responsibility, and appropriate emergency care infrastructure are essential prerequisites.