Frontiers in psychology · 2026
Consensus-based guidelines for emotional intelligence interventions for first-year higher education students: a Delphi study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Teixeira Fátima M, Araújo Alexandra M, Cabello Rosario
Аннотация
A successful transition to higher education (HE) is associated with cognitive, social, and emotional skills that help students navigate developmental, contextual, and academic challenges. Emotional Intelligence (EI) has been linked to psychological adjustment and academic functioning. However, few interventions targeting first-year students are guided by structured and theoretically coherent frameworks. This study aimed to develop consensus-derived guidelines for a tailored EI intervention designed to support emotional abilities, adaptation to HE, academic success, and well-being among first-year students. The proposed framework focuses on three core components: design, content, and efficacy assessment. Adopting a two-round modified e-Delphi method, a preliminary questionnaire was developed from an extensive review of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and previously published interventions, and subsequently piloted by four specialists to ensure thematic relevance and clarity. An international panel of 12 experts in emotional competence and academic success in HE participated in iterative Delphi rounds to establish consensus regarding the intervention's components and assessment procedures. Consensus was reached on a 10-session intervention delivered for 2 h once a week, incorporating team-based activities, role-plays, group discussions, and emotional literacy exercises, supported by tailored intervention materials and activities assigned between sessions. Regarding the intervention's content, consensus was reached on integrating the four-branch EI abilities model throughout the intervention, alongside additional themes such as mental health and self-esteem. For assessment, experts also reached consensus on a mixed-methods approach, combining self-report and ability-based measures with focus groups and session-level assessments. A baseline assessment would be conducted 1 week before the intervention with at least one follow-up assessment. The findings highlight the experts' perceived importance of structured socioemotional interventions tailored to the needs of first-year students in HE. This study provides preliminary, expert-informed guidelines that may support the future development and implementation of EI interventions in HE settings and contributes to ongoing discussions regarding the practical application of EI models in HE contexts, and underscores the need for future empirical validation and implementation research.