MedElevator
Войти в исследования Primary health care research & development · 2026
Associations between complication risk perception, gender role stress, and symptom management self-efficacy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Çakmak Betül, Abay Halime, Çelik Nazan
Аннотация
AIMS: This study aimed to examine the associations among complication risk perception, gender role stress, and symptom management self-efficacy in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and to identify factors associated with these constructs.
METHODS: This analytical cross-sectional study was performed at the endocrinology outpatient clinic of a hospital. The sample consisted of 500 Type 2 DM patients (250 women, 250 men). Study data were gathered through the Individual Information Form (IIF), Risk Perception Survey-Diabetes Mellitus Scale (RPS-DM), Symptom Management Scale for Self-Efficacy (SMSSE), Feminine Gender Role Stress Scale (FGRSS), and Masculine Gender Role Stress Scale (MGRSS). The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Spearman correlation coefficients, and binary logistic regression.
RESULTS: It was determined that both in women and men, it was found that as gender role stress increased, composite and environmental risk perceptions increased, and symptom management self-efficacy decreased (p < 0.001). According to logistic regression analysis, when risk knowledge increases in women, self-efficacy will increase (OR: 0.595), and composite risk perception will decrease (OR: 7.377). When composite risk perception increases in men, self-efficacy will decrease (OR: 16.933).
CONCLUSIONS: Complication risk perception and gender role stress were associated with symptom management self-efficacy among patients with Type 2 DM, with these associations differing by sex. Future interventional studies are needed to determine whether addressing these factors improves symptom management for self-efficacy. The findings may also help nurses recognize sex-specific differences when planning individualized patient care.
METHODS: This analytical cross-sectional study was performed at the endocrinology outpatient clinic of a hospital. The sample consisted of 500 Type 2 DM patients (250 women, 250 men). Study data were gathered through the Individual Information Form (IIF), Risk Perception Survey-Diabetes Mellitus Scale (RPS-DM), Symptom Management Scale for Self-Efficacy (SMSSE), Feminine Gender Role Stress Scale (FGRSS), and Masculine Gender Role Stress Scale (MGRSS). The data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Spearman correlation coefficients, and binary logistic regression.
RESULTS: It was determined that both in women and men, it was found that as gender role stress increased, composite and environmental risk perceptions increased, and symptom management self-efficacy decreased (p < 0.001). According to logistic regression analysis, when risk knowledge increases in women, self-efficacy will increase (OR: 0.595), and composite risk perception will decrease (OR: 7.377). When composite risk perception increases in men, self-efficacy will decrease (OR: 16.933).
CONCLUSIONS: Complication risk perception and gender role stress were associated with symptom management self-efficacy among patients with Type 2 DM, with these associations differing by sex. Future interventional studies are needed to determine whether addressing these factors improves symptom management for self-efficacy. The findings may also help nurses recognize sex-specific differences when planning individualized patient care.