Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026
Cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the New Scale of Sexual Satisfaction (NSSS-BR) for sexuality and HIV.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elias Henrique Ciabotti, Corsino Ana Carolina Franco, Sousa Laelson Rochelle Milanês, Antonini Marcela, Gomez-Cantarino Sagrario, Gir Elucir, Reis Renata Karina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the New Scale of Sexual Satisfaction (NSSS-BR) into Brazilian Portuguese for people living with HIV (PLHIV).
METHODS: This was a five-stage methodological study: translation, expert review, back-translation, semantic analysis, and pre-testing. The sample included 10 raters, 43 PLHIV in the test, and 40 in the pretest, conducted between November and December 2023 at a nursing school and a specialized HIV/AIDS service in São Paulo. Inclusion criteria varied by stage and included clinical experience, scientific publications, language proficiency, legal age, and ongoing clinical care. Data were collected via REDCap® and analyzed using SPSS®.
RESULTS: The Content Validity Index (CVI) was satisfactory: Individual CVI ranging from 0.87 to 0.99, and Global CVI of 0.90. Most participants considered the scale understandable and appropriate.
CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version has been adapted, is understandable, and is culturally equivalent to the original.
METHODS: This was a five-stage methodological study: translation, expert review, back-translation, semantic analysis, and pre-testing. The sample included 10 raters, 43 PLHIV in the test, and 40 in the pretest, conducted between November and December 2023 at a nursing school and a specialized HIV/AIDS service in São Paulo. Inclusion criteria varied by stage and included clinical experience, scientific publications, language proficiency, legal age, and ongoing clinical care. Data were collected via REDCap® and analyzed using SPSS®.
RESULTS: The Content Validity Index (CVI) was satisfactory: Individual CVI ranging from 0.87 to 0.99, and Global CVI of 0.90. Most participants considered the scale understandable and appropriate.
CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version has been adapted, is understandable, and is culturally equivalent to the original.