DOI 10.7224/1537-2073.2024-096
Implementation of Cognition, Fatigue, and Mental Health Screening at a Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Center: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Abstract.
BACKGROUND
Mental health concerns, cognitive impairment, and fatigue are prevalent among Canadians with multiple sclerosis (MS), yet many neurology clinics are not equipped to adequately address these concerns. In this quality improvement initiative, low-burden systems were implemented at an MS clinic with the aim of improving the identification of these invisible symptoms among people with MS.
METHODS
Self-report questionnaires assessing anxiety, depression, and fatigue were electronically administered to patients prior to clinic appointments. When moderate mental health symptoms were reported, clinicians were alerted by a best practice advisory and directed to provide the patient with a list of local low- and no-cost mental health services. An MS-sensitive cognitive task was also administered via a tablet upon check-in to patients meeting with the physician assistant (PA). Data were collected from appointment notes over 10 clinic days before and after implementation.
RESULTS
From pre- to post implementation, the proportion of patients who received formal mental health screening increased from 0% to 54.55%, and the proportion of patients with mental health concerns who were offered resources increased from 23.53% to 47.83%. The proportion of patients who received formal fatigue screening increased from 0% to 22.46%. The rate of cognitive testing in visits with the PA increased from 33.33% to 85.11%.
CONCLUSIONS
This initiative improved mental health, cognitive, and fatigue screening and established a foundation for ongoing quality improvement initiatives to better meet best practice recommendations for comprehensive MS care.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.