DOI 10.1186/s12877-026-08052-y
Cluster analysis of elderly emergency department patients in Taiwan: identifying clinical profiles and healthcare utilization patterns.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
To identify distinct clinical phenotypes among older adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) using an unsupervised machine learning approach and to characterize their clinical characteristics, healthcare utilization patterns, and discharge outcomes.
METHODS
The retrospective study was based on secondary analysis of data from the "Program for the Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale (TTAS) for Elderly in Emergency Department". A total of 1,617 non-traumatic older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) presenting to the emergency department (ED) were included. K-prototypes cluster analysis, an unsupervised machine learning approach, was used to identify distinct clinical phenotypes.
RESULTS
The K-prototypes clustering algorithm identified three distinct phenotypes: Cluster 1 (frail and highly comorbid; 31.6%), Cluster 2 (younger and functionally preserved; 32.2%), and Cluster 3 (metabolically burdened; 36.2%). Cluster 1 was characterized by the highest median ED costs (4,191.5 points) and the longest LOS (median 8 days). Although 77.1% of patients in Cluster 2 were discharged from the ED, those requiring hospitalization had the highest proportion of in-hospital death or against advice discharge (AAD) (17.6%). Cluster 3 demonstrated obesity and metabolic risks but maintained relatively intact functional status.
CONCLUSIONS
Machine learning clustering identified distinct clinical phenotypes among older adults presenting to the ED. These phenotypes may provide additional insights into the heterogeneity of this population and could help inform future phenotype-oriented risk stratification and individualized emergency care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.