Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology · 2026
Separating prognostic association from treatment-effect modification of a baseline mucosal inflammatory-response score in ulcerative colitis biologic trials.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jiang Mengyao, Meng Qingxi, Xue Linghan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Baseline mucosal inflammation may be associated with outcome without modifying treatment benefit. We separated these questions for a fixed inflammatory-response score in ulcerative colitis biologic studies.
METHODS: A fixed 200-gene score was calculated with platform-specific probe mapping and accession-level baseline standardization. Treatment-by-score interactions were estimated in three randomized active-versus-placebo datasets. Prognostic associations were synthesized across seven treated cohorts, longitudinal change across six paired cohorts, and cellular localization using donor-aware single-cell summaries.
RESULTS: The randomized branch included 681 participants. All three interaction odds ratios were below one (0.64, 0.46, and 0.76), but their 95% confidence intervals were wide and crossed one. Among 541 actively treated participants, higher baseline scores were associated with poorer outcome (pooled odds ratio 0.44, 0.33-0.58). Among 154 paired participants, responders had a lower baseline-adjusted follow-up score (-1.07 standardized units, -1.61 to -0.53). Analysis of 212,623 cells localized the programme across epithelial, myeloid, and fibroblast/pericyte compartments. Baseline compartment analyses included only 18-19 donors and did not establish a remission association.
CONCLUSIONS: Across the analysed public datasets, baseline mucosal inflammation showed a consistent adverse prognostic association and response-associated decline. The randomized evidence did not establish treatment-effect modification, and prospective independent validation is required before clinical use.
METHODS: A fixed 200-gene score was calculated with platform-specific probe mapping and accession-level baseline standardization. Treatment-by-score interactions were estimated in three randomized active-versus-placebo datasets. Prognostic associations were synthesized across seven treated cohorts, longitudinal change across six paired cohorts, and cellular localization using donor-aware single-cell summaries.
RESULTS: The randomized branch included 681 participants. All three interaction odds ratios were below one (0.64, 0.46, and 0.76), but their 95% confidence intervals were wide and crossed one. Among 541 actively treated participants, higher baseline scores were associated with poorer outcome (pooled odds ratio 0.44, 0.33-0.58). Among 154 paired participants, responders had a lower baseline-adjusted follow-up score (-1.07 standardized units, -1.61 to -0.53). Analysis of 212,623 cells localized the programme across epithelial, myeloid, and fibroblast/pericyte compartments. Baseline compartment analyses included only 18-19 donors and did not establish a remission association.
CONCLUSIONS: Across the analysed public datasets, baseline mucosal inflammation showed a consistent adverse prognostic association and response-associated decline. The randomized evidence did not establish treatment-effect modification, and prospective independent validation is required before clinical use.