Journal of blood medicine · 2026
Association of HPA Genotypes w ith Platelet Apheresis Donation Frequency and Yield Among Chinese Donors: A Cross-Sectional Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fang Weiwei, Lu Fengliang, Li Xin, Wang Meng, Li Xiying
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Human platelet antigens (HPA) are clinically significant in transfusion refractoriness, but whether HPA genotypes are associated with cumulative donation frequency or apheresis yield remains unknown.
METHODS: We genotyped 1,242 platelet apheresis donors from Harbin, China for eight HPA systems (HPA-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -15, and -21). Outcomes were cumulative donation count and index yield (0.5/1/2 units). Univariate analyses used Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Multivariable negative binomial and binary logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex, ABO, and ethnicity. Sensitivity analyses excluded first-time donors, stratified by age, and removed the top 5% of donors.
RESULTS: HPA-3 and HPA-15 were the most polymorphic (b-allele frequencies: 42.0% and 44.5%). However, neither HPA-3 nor HPA-15 was significantly associated with cumulative donation count in multivariable negative binomial regression (HPA-15 ab vs aa+bb: IRR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.90-1.15, P=0.79; HPA-3 b carrier vs aa: IRR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1.10, P=0.66). Similarly, no significant association was found between HPA-15 b carrier status and apheresis yield (OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.76-1.25, P=0.83). These null findings remained consistent across all sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort of northern Chinese Han platelet apheresis donors, HPA genotypes-including the polymorphic HPA-3 and HPA-15 systems-were not significantly associated with donation frequency or apheresis yield.
METHODS: We genotyped 1,242 platelet apheresis donors from Harbin, China for eight HPA systems (HPA-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -15, and -21). Outcomes were cumulative donation count and index yield (0.5/1/2 units). Univariate analyses used Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Multivariable negative binomial and binary logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex, ABO, and ethnicity. Sensitivity analyses excluded first-time donors, stratified by age, and removed the top 5% of donors.
RESULTS: HPA-3 and HPA-15 were the most polymorphic (b-allele frequencies: 42.0% and 44.5%). However, neither HPA-3 nor HPA-15 was significantly associated with cumulative donation count in multivariable negative binomial regression (HPA-15 ab vs aa+bb: IRR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.90-1.15, P=0.79; HPA-3 b carrier vs aa: IRR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.85-1.10, P=0.66). Similarly, no significant association was found between HPA-15 b carrier status and apheresis yield (OR=0.97, 95% CI: 0.76-1.25, P=0.83). These null findings remained consistent across all sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: In this cohort of northern Chinese Han platelet apheresis donors, HPA genotypes-including the polymorphic HPA-3 and HPA-15 systems-were not significantly associated with donation frequency or apheresis yield.