Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
Multidisciplinary perioperative management of robot-assisted renal surgery: practical considerations for partial nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shigemura Katsumi, Yamaguchi Masaya, Shiraishi Hiromasa, Sakuma Takafumi, Kuroda Mayura, Ishito Noritaka, Kusudo Kazuhito, Shintani Akihiro, Yamashita Yumiko, Yamamoto Yasuo
Аннотация
Robot-assisted surgery is established across urology, but its safety depends on more than console performance. Restricted access to the patient, limited tactile feedback, external arm collisions, phase transitions, and communication failures create risks that must be managed collectively. This narrative review summarizes multidisciplinary perioperative management for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) and introduces a proposed practice-based framework. The framework was developed by integrating multidisciplinary educational sessions and case-based discussions with a narrative synthesis of relevant literature. For RAPN, shared understanding of tumor localization, vascular-control and ischemia strategies when used, tumor excision, reconstruction when required, and hemostasis enables anticipatory preparation. For RANU, teams should anticipate transitions among renal, ureteral, and bladder-cuff phases, including possible redocking and changes in positioning or instruments. Across both procedures, recurring multidisciplinary tasks were organized into five functions: PLAN, POSITION, PREPARE, PERFORM, and PASS ON. These functions are intended to recur iteratively at critical transitions and to support shared situational awareness, closed-loop communication, emergency readiness, and structured postoperative handover. The proposed framework has not yet been validated; prospective studies should evaluate process measures, staff-reported outcomes, and patient outcomes.