Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde · 2025
Indications and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Immediate Sequential Bilateral Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Case Series.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Simpson Alasdair I, Gigon Anthony, Whitlow Shane, McGowan Gerard, Burgula Sree, Ramsden Conor M, Chandra Aman, Keller Johannes, Davies Andrew, Hussain Rumana, Steel David H, Saidkasimova Shohista
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: <p>Introduction: Bilateral vision threatening vitreoretinal disease requiring urgent surgery such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy, vitreous haemorrhage and retinal detachment are not uncommon presentations. Accepted practice has been to address each eye in separate, staged procedures. However, there are specific circumstances in which operating on both eyes in the same anaesthetic sitting may be preferable. Immediate sequential bilateral vitreoretinal surgery (ISBVS) has rarely been described in the literature. We present a series of cases and discuss the indications, risks and relative merits of this approach.
METHOD: Multicentre retrospective case series of patients undergoing ISBVS. We circulated a proforma to surgeons across the UK to collate a series of cases of this rarely performed approach to collate indications, operative approach and post-operative results.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients (34 eyes) underwent ISBVS from 8 centres. Twenty eyes had rhematogenous retinal detachments, 12 eyes had diabetic vitreous haemorrhage or tractional detachment and 2 had full-thickness macular hole. Principal pathology was the same bilaterally in each case. Indications for bilateral surgery included bilateral disease requiring urgent surgical intervention, high-risk general anaesthetic, anticipated difficulty with follow-up, convenience in post-operative care and patient preference. Visual acuity improved in 22 eyes and worsened in 2. Post-operative complications included four eyes with elevated intraocular pressure, three vitreous haemorrhages, one cystoid macular oedema, and one with a macular fold. One required re-operation for non-clearing vitreous haemorrhage.
CONCLUSION: ISBVS is a useful approach which may be underutilised, but further studies are required to validate its safety. </p>.
METHOD: Multicentre retrospective case series of patients undergoing ISBVS. We circulated a proforma to surgeons across the UK to collate a series of cases of this rarely performed approach to collate indications, operative approach and post-operative results.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients (34 eyes) underwent ISBVS from 8 centres. Twenty eyes had rhematogenous retinal detachments, 12 eyes had diabetic vitreous haemorrhage or tractional detachment and 2 had full-thickness macular hole. Principal pathology was the same bilaterally in each case. Indications for bilateral surgery included bilateral disease requiring urgent surgical intervention, high-risk general anaesthetic, anticipated difficulty with follow-up, convenience in post-operative care and patient preference. Visual acuity improved in 22 eyes and worsened in 2. Post-operative complications included four eyes with elevated intraocular pressure, three vitreous haemorrhages, one cystoid macular oedema, and one with a macular fold. One required re-operation for non-clearing vitreous haemorrhage.
CONCLUSION: ISBVS is a useful approach which may be underutilised, but further studies are required to validate its safety. </p>.