BMC infectious diseases · 2026
Ceftazidime-avibactam as a polymyxin-sparing option for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections in children: a real-world comparative cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aslan Tuncay Sevgi, Akkoc Gulsen, Celikboya Ezgi, Yilmaz Seyhan, Parlak Burcu, Canizci Erdemli Pinar, Dizi Isik Aylin, Aytac Didem Buyuktas, Abaci Capar Meryem Cagla, Eser Ahmet Furkan, Yalindag Ozturk Makbule Nilufer, Kepenekli Eda, Ocal Demir Sevliya
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections are challenging to treat in children, and polymyxin-based regimens are limited by toxicity. We evaluated the real-world use of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) as a potential polymyxin-sparing option for children with MDR Gram-negative infections.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective comparative cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye. Children aged < 18 years who received definitive therapy for microbiologically confirmed MDR Gram-negative infections between January 2022 and May 2024 were included. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical response, documented microbiological clearance, acute kidney injury (AKI), drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and one-year all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Forty-five children were included: 15 received CZA-based therapy and 30 received non-CZA regimens. Mechanical ventilation was required in 40/45 (88.9%) patients, reflecting a critically ill cohort. Steroid exposure within 30 days (46.7% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.003) and prior carbapenem exposure (93.3% versus 56.7%; P = 0.016) were more frequent in the CZA group. Clinical response (73.3% versus 73.3%; P = 1.000) and 28-day all-cause mortality (40.0% versus 40.0%; P = 1.000) were comparable between groups. Documented microbiological clearance, AKI and DILI did not differ significantly. Similar findings were observed in the CZA vs. meropenem plus colistin subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: CZA-based therapy showed similar observed outcomes and no clear excess toxicity signal compared with heterogeneous non-CZA regimens, despite preferential use in children with greater recent antimicrobial exposure and clinical complexity. These findings support CZA as a feasible polymyxin-sparing option in selected children.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective comparative cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye. Children aged < 18 years who received definitive therapy for microbiologically confirmed MDR Gram-negative infections between January 2022 and May 2024 were included. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical response, documented microbiological clearance, acute kidney injury (AKI), drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and one-year all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Forty-five children were included: 15 received CZA-based therapy and 30 received non-CZA regimens. Mechanical ventilation was required in 40/45 (88.9%) patients, reflecting a critically ill cohort. Steroid exposure within 30 days (46.7% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.003) and prior carbapenem exposure (93.3% versus 56.7%; P = 0.016) were more frequent in the CZA group. Clinical response (73.3% versus 73.3%; P = 1.000) and 28-day all-cause mortality (40.0% versus 40.0%; P = 1.000) were comparable between groups. Documented microbiological clearance, AKI and DILI did not differ significantly. Similar findings were observed in the CZA vs. meropenem plus colistin subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: CZA-based therapy showed similar observed outcomes and no clear excess toxicity signal compared with heterogeneous non-CZA regimens, despite preferential use in children with greater recent antimicrobial exposure and clinical complexity. These findings support CZA as a feasible polymyxin-sparing option in selected children.