DOI 10.1097/ju.0000000000005216
Patterns of Lymph Node Metastases From Mid and Distal Ureteral Carcinoma.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Accurate mapping of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) guides lymph node dissection templates and affects staging and adjuvant therapy decisions. LNM patterns for mid and distal ureteral tumors remain undercharacterized. Herein, we map LNM for mid and distal ureteral UTUC.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Retrospective single-institution study of 24 patients with clinical or pathological node-positive mid and distal UTUC defined by preoperative imaging, biopsy, and/or pathology following template lymphadenectomy. We recorded tumor laterality/location and nodal location/quantity. Descriptive statistics summarized distributions.
RESULTS
Forty-five primary LNMs were documented in 24 patients: right mid (n = 3 patients, 9 LNM), right distal (n = 8, 14 LNM), left mid (n = 4, 8 LNM), and left distal (n = 9, 14 LNM). Among mid-UTUC, LNMs were distributed between retroperitoneal (53%, n = 9/17) and pelvic (47%, n = 8/17) regions. Among distal-UTUC, 61% (17/28) involved pelvic nodes with retroperitoneal LNMs comprising 39% (11/28). Among patients with retroperitoneal spread, isolated retroperitoneal LNMs without pelvic nodal involvement were observed in 33% (n = 1/3) and 83% (n = 5/6) of patients with mid- and distal-UTUC.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the largest mapping series for mid and distal ureteral tumors to date. Retroperitoneal LNMs occurred in over half of the patients with mid-UTUC and over one-third of patients with distal-UTUC, and among patients with retroperitoneal spread, the majority had retroperitoneal LNM without concurrent pelvic LNMs. These findings provide anatomic data to inform putative dissection templates for surgeons and future prospective studies.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.