Danish translation and linguistic validation of the Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Increased focus on monitoring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in melanoma patients has highlighted the need for validated instruments such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Rather than developing new measures, it is generally recommended to translate and linguistically validate a suitable existing PROM.
METHODS
The Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire (MCQ-28) was adapted from English to Danish following the guidelines by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). A forward-and-backwards translation was conducted, followed by cognitive debriefing interviews based on the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN), focusing on comprehensiveness, comprehensibility and relevance.
RESULTS
The Danish MCQ-28 was tested on 21 patients, including seven in each risk group. Overall responses were positive, though several patients - especially those at a low risk or further in follow-up process - struggled with the timeframe of certain items. The interviews also revealed that some items were interpreted differently depending on individual patient perspectives.
CONCLUSIONS
By following the ISPOR guideline, a culturally relevant, linguistically validated Danish version of the MCQ-28 was developed. It is a candidate for implementation in Danish melanoma follow-up and for use in international HRQoL research on melanoma patients; however, psychometric validation in a Danish context is necessary.
FUNDING: The Herlev and Gentofte Hospital Research Fund.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.