Journal of women's health (2002) · 2026
Geography, Policy, and System Strain in U.S. Obstetric and Gynecologic Care.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Winkel Abigail Ford, Park Hannah, Rossi Julia, Strasser Julia, Clare Camille A, Morgan Helen K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine how abortion policy environments and geographic context are associated with reproductive health outcomes, and to characterize implications for obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) care.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis exploring associations between outcomes of health care quality and access ranked in the 2024 Commonwealth Fund State Scorecard to Guttmacher abortion policy categories (restrictive, middle-ground, and protective) and U.S. Census regions. Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests with Dunn post hoc comparisons and Spearman correlations assessed the relationship of these environmental factors with 32 outcomes.
RESULTS: Southern states had worse overall reproductive health rankings than other regions (p < 0.001). Restrictive abortion policy states had poorer outcomes across all domains of OBGYN care and access (p < 0.01). Higher rural population correlated with higher infant mortality (r = 0.31, p = 0.028), preterm birth (r = 0.36, p = 0.010), depression before/during pregnancy (r = 0.71, p < 0.001), and poor mental health (r = 0.44, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Health disparities associated with restrictive abortion policies and geographic inequities signal regional variation in OBGYN workforce strain, reinforcing the need for systems-level, context-aware strategies to support retention and sustainability.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis exploring associations between outcomes of health care quality and access ranked in the 2024 Commonwealth Fund State Scorecard to Guttmacher abortion policy categories (restrictive, middle-ground, and protective) and U.S. Census regions. Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum tests with Dunn post hoc comparisons and Spearman correlations assessed the relationship of these environmental factors with 32 outcomes.
RESULTS: Southern states had worse overall reproductive health rankings than other regions (p < 0.001). Restrictive abortion policy states had poorer outcomes across all domains of OBGYN care and access (p < 0.01). Higher rural population correlated with higher infant mortality (r = 0.31, p = 0.028), preterm birth (r = 0.36, p = 0.010), depression before/during pregnancy (r = 0.71, p < 0.001), and poor mental health (r = 0.44, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Health disparities associated with restrictive abortion policies and geographic inequities signal regional variation in OBGYN workforce strain, reinforcing the need for systems-level, context-aware strategies to support retention and sustainability.