Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
Artificial Intelligence as a Digital Consultant: Evaluating Large Language Models for Patient Inquiries on Dental Caries.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Erdal Betül, Duman Fatmanur Merve, Altınkılıç Mehmet Robin, Horoz Meltem
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical accuracy, usefulness, global overall quality (GQS), and readability of ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek responses to patient questions regarding dental caries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine simulated patient questions concerning caries diagnosis, etiology, treatment, and prevention were queried in Turkish. Three restorative dentists independently evaluated the responses for accuracy, usefulness, and GQS. Readability was assessed using the Ateşman index. Statistical analyses included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interrater reliability, the Friedman test for performance comparisons among the models, and Spearman's rank correlation to analyze the relationships between the clinical variables.
RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was high across all criteria (ICC > 0.75). Significant performance differences existed among the models (p < 0.001); Gemini achieved the highest overall clinical accuracy, usefulness, and GQS scores. ChatGPT produced the most readable texts, categorized generally as "easy to read" according to the Ateşman index. For DeepSeek, higher clinical accuracy significantly correlated with better readability (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Gemini offers the highest accuracy and quality as a digital preconsultation tool. However, AI tools should complement, not replace, professional dental advice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine simulated patient questions concerning caries diagnosis, etiology, treatment, and prevention were queried in Turkish. Three restorative dentists independently evaluated the responses for accuracy, usefulness, and GQS. Readability was assessed using the Ateşman index. Statistical analyses included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for interrater reliability, the Friedman test for performance comparisons among the models, and Spearman's rank correlation to analyze the relationships between the clinical variables.
RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was high across all criteria (ICC > 0.75). Significant performance differences existed among the models (p < 0.001); Gemini achieved the highest overall clinical accuracy, usefulness, and GQS scores. ChatGPT produced the most readable texts, categorized generally as "easy to read" according to the Ateşman index. For DeepSeek, higher clinical accuracy significantly correlated with better readability (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Gemini offers the highest accuracy and quality as a digital preconsultation tool. However, AI tools should complement, not replace, professional dental advice.