Lightweight open-source reasoning large language model for evidence synthesis screening.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate performance and efficiency of a lightweight open-source reasoning large language model (LLM) against an expert-derived reference standard for screening scientific publication databases.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Two expert reviewers screened subsets of database records across 3 stages: (1) base eligibility (n = 200), (2) obesity focus (n = 200), and (3) women of reproductive age focus (n = 150). The LLM (gpt-oss-20b) screened all records (n = 20 118). Performance (F1-score and sensitivity [recall]) and efficiency (average screening rate) were assessed.

RESULTS

Interreader agreement was near-perfect ( κ : 0.99-1.00; all P < .001). LLM performance was high: F1-score, 0.83-0.94; sensitivity, 90%-95%; specificity, 86%-99%; accuracy, 89%-94%; precision, 77%-99%; and negative predictive value (NPV), 89%-96%. LLM screening was faster than reviewers (19.4 vs ∼1.0 records/min).

DISCUSSION: The LLM achieved high performance and efficiency relative to an expert-derived reference standard for screening.

CONCLUSION

The use of lightweight open-source reasoning LLMs shows promise to support screening in evidence synthesis workflows.