MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco-26-02188

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026

COMPANION-002: A Randomized Phase 2/3 Trial of Tovecimig Plus Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel Alone as a Second-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.

Azad Nilofer S, Hu Ian, Pathak Priyadarshini, Sahin Ilyas, Aranha Olivia, Iyer Renuka, Heestand Gregory, Liao Chih-Yi, Hochster Howard S, Kalyan Aparna, El-Khoueiry Anthony, Paulson Andrew Scott, Kelley Robin Kate, Borad Mitesh, Goyal Lipika, Sirard Cynthia A, Schuetz Thomas J, Javle Milind

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Patients with previously treated biliary tract cancer (BTC) have a short median overall survival (OS), and few treatment options. Tovecimig, a bispecific antibody to delta-like ligand-4 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, was evaluated in combination with paclitaxel in COMPANION-002, a randomized phase 2/3 study in pretreated patients with advanced BTC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced BTC with one prior systemic therapy were randomized to paclitaxel (80 mg/m2; days 1, 8 and 15) with or without tovecimig (10 mg/kg; days 1 and 15). The primary endpoint was RECIST v1.1-defined objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Crossover from the paclitaxel control arm to tovecimig plus paclitaxel was permitted following BICR-confirmed progression.

RESULTS

168 patients were randomized 2:1 to tovecimig+paclitaxel (n=111) or paclitaxel alone (n=57). Tovecimig+paclitaxel significantly improved BICR-assessed ORR (18.0% vs 5.3%; P=.0228) and PFS (4.7 vs 2.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; P<.0001). Among 31 patients (54%) who crossed over, post-progression PFS (time from crossover to subsequent second progression) exceeded initial PFS (PFS from randomization to initial progression on paclitaxel; 3.5 vs 1.9 months; HR, 0.40; P=.0035). Overall, 142 patients (85%) received tovecimig; no difference in OS was observed (HR, 1.05; P=.779). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with tovecimig+paclitaxel were hypertension (69.4%) and fatigue (66.7%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 93.5% and 64.2% of patients treated with tovecimig+paclitaxel and paclitaxel alone, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Tovecimig combined with paclitaxel significantly improved ORR and PFS versus paclitaxel alone as second-line therapy for patients with BTC.

Для цитирования: Azad Nilofer S, Hu Ian, Pathak Priyadarshini, Sahin Ilyas, Aranha Olivia, Iyer Renuka, Heestand Gregory, Liao Chih-Yi, Hochster Howard S, Kalyan Aparna, El-Khoueiry Anthony, Paulson Andrew Scott, Kelley Robin Kate, Borad Mitesh, Goyal Lipika, Sirard Cynthia A, Schuetz Thomas J, Javle Milind. COMPANION-002: A Randomized Phase 2/3 Trial of Tovecimig Plus Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel Alone as a Second-line Therapy in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.1200/jco-26-02188.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.