Current developments in nutrition · 2026
Opportunities and Challenges for Promoting Sustainable Diets within "Food is Medicine" Programs in the United States: A Qualitative Research Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Consavage Stanley Katherine, Harrigan Paige B, Houghtaling Bailey, Serrano Elena, Holz Adrienne, Hedrick Valisa E, Kraak Vivica I
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The United States population is experiencing concurrent, interrelated challenges of diet-related chronic diseases, food and nutrition insecurity, and climate change. Food is Medicine (FIM) has been described as a range of food-based programs that aim to prevent, manage, and treat diet-related chronic diseases in partnership with health care systems. Research is lacking in how these programs could promote plant-rich dietary patterns and other sustainability practices to support both human and planetary health.
OBJECTIVES: This study explored how FIM experts in the United States define FIM and plant-rich dietary patterns and their views on the opportunities and challenges to incorporating sustainable diet practices into FIM programs.
METHODS: We conducted semistructured Zoom interviews with 20 national FIM experts between July and October 2024. Participants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis guided by the socioecological model.
RESULTS: Expert perspectives differed on the definition and scope of FIM but largely agreed on the components of a plant-rich dietary pattern. Participants viewed produce prescriptions and medically tailored meal and grocery programs as aligned with plant-rich dietary patterns but described challenges with the lack of standardization across programs. Experts described pilot FIM programs that have incorporated sustainability practices but lacked explicit messaging on the human and planetary health cobenefits. Supporting local or regenerative producers and reducing food waste were identified as sustainability practices that could be systematically incorporated into FIM programs. Challenges included misalignment with the political environment and policy and systems barriers that restrict enabling environments for supporting sustainable diets.
CONCLUSIONS: The FIM movement offers promising opportunities to promote collaboration among food and health system actors, but challenges require coordinated actions within and across sectors. Future FIM programs could identify potential areas of human and planetary health cobenefit and incorporate sustainable diet principles into program design and evaluation.
OBJECTIVES: This study explored how FIM experts in the United States define FIM and plant-rich dietary patterns and their views on the opportunities and challenges to incorporating sustainable diet practices into FIM programs.
METHODS: We conducted semistructured Zoom interviews with 20 national FIM experts between July and October 2024. Participants were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were analyzed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis guided by the socioecological model.
RESULTS: Expert perspectives differed on the definition and scope of FIM but largely agreed on the components of a plant-rich dietary pattern. Participants viewed produce prescriptions and medically tailored meal and grocery programs as aligned with plant-rich dietary patterns but described challenges with the lack of standardization across programs. Experts described pilot FIM programs that have incorporated sustainability practices but lacked explicit messaging on the human and planetary health cobenefits. Supporting local or regenerative producers and reducing food waste were identified as sustainability practices that could be systematically incorporated into FIM programs. Challenges included misalignment with the political environment and policy and systems barriers that restrict enabling environments for supporting sustainable diets.
CONCLUSIONS: The FIM movement offers promising opportunities to promote collaboration among food and health system actors, but challenges require coordinated actions within and across sectors. Future FIM programs could identify potential areas of human and planetary health cobenefit and incorporate sustainable diet principles into program design and evaluation.