MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.15557/jou.2025.0032

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of ultrasonography · 2025

Agreement between sonographic and pathoanatomic classifications of pediatric urachal remnants.

Oerters Laura S, Maasewerd Sophie H K, Born Mark, Hohenadel Maximilian, Heydweiller Andreas C, von Sochaczewski Christina Oetzmann

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: Ultrasound is the favorite method for follow-up of urachal remnants when conservative management is chosen instead of surgical resection. However, the success of conservative management depends on the type of urachal anomaly, and the agreement between sonographic and pathoanatomic diagnoses has not yet been assessed.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We retrospectively included all minors treated for a urachal anomaly at two German pediatric surgical centers between January 2008 and December 2020. Ultrasound examinations were conducted by specialized pediatric radiologists and compared with pathoanatomic reports following resection of the urachal anomaly, with respect to its type.

RESULTS

We included 15 patients with a median age of 0.2 years. The crude agreement between ultrasound and pathoanatomic diagnosis was 70%, and Cohen's κ was 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.3 - 1, z = 3.83, p <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound identified the type of urachal anomaly with sufficient accuracy in this cohort; however, these findings should be corroborated by a substantially larger study.

Для цитирования: Oerters Laura S, Maasewerd Sophie H K, Born Mark, Hohenadel Maximilian, Heydweiller Andreas C, von Sochaczewski Christina Oetzmann. Agreement between sonographic and pathoanatomic classifications of pediatric urachal remnants.. Journal of ultrasonography. 2025. DOI: 10.15557/jou.2025.0032.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.