MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.008

Медицинская библиотека · European urology oncology · 2023

A Systematic Review of Oncological Outcomes Associated with Bladder-sparing Strategies in Patients Achieving Complete Clinical Response to Initial Systemic Treatment for Localized Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Grobet-Jeandin Elisabeth, Lenfant Louis, Mir Carmen, Giannarini Gianluca, Alcaraz Antonio, Albersen Maarten, Breda Alberto, Briganti Alberto, Rouprêt Morgan, Seisen Thomas, EAU Section of Oncological Urology (ESOU) Board

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

CONTEXT: Bladder-sparing strategies (BSSs) have been proposed for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients achieving clinical complete response (cCR) to initial systemic treatment to avoid toxicity related to radical cystectomy.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the current literature evaluating oncological outcomes of BSSs in patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment for localized MIBC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A computerized bibliographic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed for all studies reporting oncological outcomes of MIBC patients undergoing either surveillance or radiation therapy after achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we identified 23 noncomparative prospective or retrospective studies published between 1990 and 2021. The mean bladder and metastatic recurrence rates (range) as well as the mean bladder preservation rate (BPR; range) were calculated, and overall survival (OS) was extracted from included reports.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Overall, 16 and seven studies evaluated surveillance (n = 610) and radiation therapy (n = 175) in MIBC patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment, respectively. With regard to surveillance, the median follow-up ranged from 10 to 120 mo, with a mean bladder recurrence rate of 43% (0-71%), including 65% of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 35% of MIBC recurrences. The mean BPR was 73% (49-100%). The mean metastatic recurrence rate was 9% (0-27%), while 5-yr OS rates ranged from 64% to 89%. With regard to radiation therapy, the median follow-up ranged from 12 to 60 mo, with a mean bladder recurrence rate of 15% (0-29%), including 24% of NMIBC, 43% of MIBC, and 33% of unspecified recurrences. The mean BPR was 74% (71-100%). The mean metastatic recurrence rate was 17% (0-22%), while the 4-yr OS rate was 79%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review showed that only low-level evidence supports the effectiveness of BSSs in selected patients achieving cCR to initial systemic treatment for localized MIBC. These preliminary findings highlight the need for further prospective comparative research to demonstrate its efficacy.

PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed studies evaluating bladder-sparing strategies in patients achieving complete clinical response to initial systemic treatment for localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Based on low-level evidence, we observed that selected patients could benefit from surveillance or radiation therapy in this setting, but prospective comparative research is requested to confirm their efficacy.

Для цитирования: Grobet-Jeandin Elisabeth, Lenfant Louis, Mir Carmen, Giannarini Gianluca, Alcaraz Antonio, Albersen Maarten, Breda Alberto, Briganti Alberto, Rouprêt Morgan, Seisen Thomas, EAU Section of Oncological Urology (ESOU) Board. A Systematic Review of Oncological Outcomes Associated with Bladder-sparing Strategies in Patients Achieving Complete Clinical Response to Initial Systemic Treatment for Localized Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.. European urology oncology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.