Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026
Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Real-World Retrospective Study Demonstrating Clinical Efficacy and Safety Across Diverse Anatomical Sites.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Safir Ari, Taleb Eyal, Berzin Daniella, Arieli Manny, Liassidou Aspasia, Shehadeh Waseem, Hafner Ariela, Artzi Ofir
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) remains a therapeutically challenging disease despite expanding research and evolving systemic treatments. Energy-based modalities, such as fractional microneedling radiofrequency (FMR), are being increasingly explored as novel treatment options.
AIM: To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of Morpheus8-based FMR treatment in patients with HS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 25 HS patients treated at a tertiary dermatology center. Seventeen patients who completed ≥ 2 FMR sessions were included in the efficacy analysis. Outcomes were assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) and IHS4-55 (≥ 55% reduction). High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) was used in selected cases to assess treatment response and inflammatory changes.
RESULTS: Sixteen of the 17 patients (94.1%) evaluated for efficacy showed clinical improvement, and nine (52.9%) achieved an IHS4-55 response. The mean IHS4 reduction was 4.6 ± 2.5. The highest response rates were observed in the face, chest, and gluteal regions, while groin and thigh showed the lowest. HFUS confirmed a reduction in inflammation. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with pain cited as the most common reason for discontinuation in 3 of 25 patients (12%).
CONCLUSION: FMR appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe HS, including those with refractory disease and lesions in anatomically challenging areas. Clinical outcomes in our cohort were comparable to those reported for advanced systemic agents and other technology-based interventions. These findings support FMR's potential role in personalized HS management - either as a standalone intervention or in combination with systemic or procedural treatments.
AIM: To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of Morpheus8-based FMR treatment in patients with HS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 25 HS patients treated at a tertiary dermatology center. Seventeen patients who completed ≥ 2 FMR sessions were included in the efficacy analysis. Outcomes were assessed by the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) and IHS4-55 (≥ 55% reduction). High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) was used in selected cases to assess treatment response and inflammatory changes.
RESULTS: Sixteen of the 17 patients (94.1%) evaluated for efficacy showed clinical improvement, and nine (52.9%) achieved an IHS4-55 response. The mean IHS4 reduction was 4.6 ± 2.5. The highest response rates were observed in the face, chest, and gluteal regions, while groin and thigh showed the lowest. HFUS confirmed a reduction in inflammation. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with pain cited as the most common reason for discontinuation in 3 of 25 patients (12%).
CONCLUSION: FMR appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with moderate-to-severe HS, including those with refractory disease and lesions in anatomically challenging areas. Clinical outcomes in our cohort were comparable to those reported for advanced systemic agents and other technology-based interventions. These findings support FMR's potential role in personalized HS management - either as a standalone intervention or in combination with systemic or procedural treatments.