Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025
Timing Return-to-Work Counseling: An Observational Study Into the Effect of Time to First Consultation on Return to Work.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Rossum Thomas B, Kok Robin N, Nieuwenhuijsen Karen
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Return-to-work (RTW) counseling is a critical part of rehabilitation of sick-listed employees with common mental disorders (CMD). In the Netherlands it is mandatory that RTW counseling with an occupational physician (OP) starts within two weeks, but current literature and guidelines provide little empiric support. This study aims to answer the questions "Is starting RTW counseling within two weeks associated with faster RTW?" and "Is there a dose-response effect (i.e. the earlier the better)?".
METHODS: In an observational design, sick-listed employees (n = 12,169) seen by an OP within two weeks of onset of sick leave were compared to those seen later using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Next, per week effects were examined, reporting pairwise comparisons of weeks 1 through 6 if the omnibus test was significant.
RESULTS: Earlier RTW counseling was associated with earlier RTW (HR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.86-0.93). There was a dose-response effect (LLR χ2: 46.08, df = 5, p < 0.001) with significant earlier RTW when RTW counseling was started in week 1 versus week 3 (HR: 0.90(95%CI 0.85-0.96), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 5 (HR: 0.88(95%CI 0.81-0.94), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 6 (HR: 0.82(95%CI 0.77-0.88), p < 0.001), and week 2 versus week 6 (HR: 0.84(95%CI 0.79-0.89), p < 0.001). However, subgroup analyses showed these findings only held for employees with adjustment disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a modest benefit to starting RTW counseling earlier. However, this effect is limited to those seen very early and there are no significant differences between weeks 2 through 5. Whether these modest benefits warrant strict adherence to a two-week deadline should be re-evaluated.
METHODS: In an observational design, sick-listed employees (n = 12,169) seen by an OP within two weeks of onset of sick leave were compared to those seen later using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Next, per week effects were examined, reporting pairwise comparisons of weeks 1 through 6 if the omnibus test was significant.
RESULTS: Earlier RTW counseling was associated with earlier RTW (HR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.86-0.93). There was a dose-response effect (LLR χ2: 46.08, df = 5, p < 0.001) with significant earlier RTW when RTW counseling was started in week 1 versus week 3 (HR: 0.90(95%CI 0.85-0.96), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 5 (HR: 0.88(95%CI 0.81-0.94), p < 0.001), week 1 versus week 6 (HR: 0.82(95%CI 0.77-0.88), p < 0.001), and week 2 versus week 6 (HR: 0.84(95%CI 0.79-0.89), p < 0.001). However, subgroup analyses showed these findings only held for employees with adjustment disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a modest benefit to starting RTW counseling earlier. However, this effect is limited to those seen very early and there are no significant differences between weeks 2 through 5. Whether these modest benefits warrant strict adherence to a two-week deadline should be re-evaluated.