The Journal of international medical research · 2024
Comparison between prefabricated ankle-foot orthoses, Dyna Ankle and UD Flex, in patients with hemiplegia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Su Ji, Kim Tae Yong, Kim Kyung Min, Cho Sung-Rae
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the kinematic effects of two widely-used prefabricated ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs), the Dyna Ankle (DA) and UD Flex (UD), on the gait cycle of patients with hemiplegia due to cerebral palsy or acquired brain injury.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 29 patients. Gait analysis results were assessed under three conditions: barefoot, with the DA, and with the UD. Friedman tests and post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction were performed to assess differences between the three conditions.
RESULTS: The DA significantly improved ankle dorsiflexion during the mid-swing phase, making it more effective in correcting foot drop compared with the UD (DA: 2.28°, UD: 0.44°). Conversely, the UD was more effective in preventing knee flexion during the loading response (DA: 28.11°, UD: 26.72°).
CONCLUSIONS: The DA improved ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase significantly more than that with the UD in patients with hemiplegia. Compared with the DA, the UD more effectively prevented increased knee flexion during the loading response. The choice to prescribe these orthoses should consider individual patient characteristics.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study involving 29 patients. Gait analysis results were assessed under three conditions: barefoot, with the DA, and with the UD. Friedman tests and post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction were performed to assess differences between the three conditions.
RESULTS: The DA significantly improved ankle dorsiflexion during the mid-swing phase, making it more effective in correcting foot drop compared with the UD (DA: 2.28°, UD: 0.44°). Conversely, the UD was more effective in preventing knee flexion during the loading response (DA: 28.11°, UD: 26.72°).
CONCLUSIONS: The DA improved ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase significantly more than that with the UD in patients with hemiplegia. Compared with the DA, the UD more effectively prevented increased knee flexion during the loading response. The choice to prescribe these orthoses should consider individual patient characteristics.