Surgical neurology international · 2024
Spinal adhesive arachnoiditis after spinal anesthesia complicated by communicating hydrocephalus - A case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
AlMutairi Abdulrahman Marzouq, Ahmed Mubasher, Basurrah Abdulaziz Abdullah, Alshehri Fayez Dhafer, Brinji Zaina, Albargi Naseem, Farag Ahmed Adel
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adhesive arachnoiditis (AA) is a debilitating condition characterized by chronic inflammation of the arachnoid membrane, leading to the formation of intrathecal scars and dural adhesions. The etiology of AA is multifactorial, including factors such as infections, trauma, and iatrogenic damage. We present a case of a female patient who developed communicating hydrocephalus after spinal anesthesia complicated by severe AA.
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 33-year-old female underwent a cesarean section with epidural anesthesia. Five hours postoperatively, she experienced transient difficulty standing, which was resolved with assistance. Weeks later, she developed a severe holocephalic headache accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Imaging revealed hydrocephalus and pronounced AA. Lumbar puncture provided symptomatic improvement. The patient underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion, resulting in further symptom improvement and successful shunt function.
CONCLUSION: AA is a challenging condition associated with inflammation and scarring of the arachnoid membrane. The development of hydrocephalus following epidural anesthesia, in this case, highlights a rare manifestation of arachnoiditis. Further research and documentation are needed to understand better the underlying mechanisms and risk factors contributing to hydrocephalus in the context of AA following epidural anesthesia.
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 33-year-old female underwent a cesarean section with epidural anesthesia. Five hours postoperatively, she experienced transient difficulty standing, which was resolved with assistance. Weeks later, she developed a severe holocephalic headache accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Imaging revealed hydrocephalus and pronounced AA. Lumbar puncture provided symptomatic improvement. The patient underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion, resulting in further symptom improvement and successful shunt function.
CONCLUSION: AA is a challenging condition associated with inflammation and scarring of the arachnoid membrane. The development of hydrocephalus following epidural anesthesia, in this case, highlights a rare manifestation of arachnoiditis. Further research and documentation are needed to understand better the underlying mechanisms and risk factors contributing to hydrocephalus in the context of AA following epidural anesthesia.