MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000511283

Медицинская библиотека · Skin appendage disorders · 2020

Nail Disease: Clinical Decisions among Portuguese Dermatologists and Family Physicians.

Monteiro Ana Filipe, Pinheiro Rita Ramos, Galhardas Célia, Lencastre André

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Onychomycosis is one of the most common nail disorders and may be difficult to distinguish from other causes of nail dystrophy, based on clinical grounds alone. With this study, we aimed to describe the use of fungal testing by dermatologists and family physicians in their daily current practice, analyze their respective familiarity with nail disease diagnosis, and ultimately treatment decision-making by both groups. An online survey was distributed among Portuguese dermatologists, trainees, and family physicians by email. The survey focused on the diagnostic impression, use of diagnostic methods to confirm a fungal infection, and the subsequent assessment of treatment. One hundred fifty-one responses were obtained, 60 (39.7%) from dermatologists and 91 (60.3%) from family physicians; 98.3% of dermatologists mentioned usually requesting a fungal testing at their local institution or outside, while this percentage was 50.5% among family physicians (p < 0.001). Regarding the diagnosis, the median of correct diagnosis by the dermatologist group was higher (10/15) than the family physicians (6/15). Considering the treatment strategy, we observed that in the dermatologists' group it would result in unnecessary treatment in a median of 2 cases, while in the family physicians' group, in a median of 4 cases.

Для цитирования: Monteiro Ana Filipe, Pinheiro Rita Ramos, Galhardas Célia, Lencastre André. Nail Disease: Clinical Decisions among Portuguese Dermatologists and Family Physicians.. Skin appendage disorders. 2020. DOI: 10.1159/000511283.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.