MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026

Early Post-Operative Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak by Local Electrophysiological Parameters: Multicenter Pilot Study.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Quint Elchanan, Segev Lior, Gaziants Vladimir, Netz Uri, Reshef Avi, White Ian, Hagani Yulie, Shenker Udi, Lerman Gilad, Fishman Ilana, Policker Shai, Shor Erez, Tulchinsky Hagit, Pinsk Ilia, Miller Rafael, Bar-Zakai Barak, Zmora Oded, Wasserberg Nir, Ben-David Matan, Knowles Charles

Аннотация

Background: Morbidity associated with anastomotic leak (AL) can be reduced by timely detection. Local electrophysiological parameters are highly sensitive to pathophysiological processes (inflammation/ischemia) underlying AL and may enable early post-op monitoring ahead of clinical signs. A new approach to early leak detection includes post-operative measurement of bioelectric activity of the GI tract. The method has been implemented in a medical device that uses electrodes embedded in a standard surgical drain to continuously monitor local bowel myoelectric activity following GI surgery. Methods: A multicenter pilot study evaluated the performance of the device to support detection of clinically recognizable anastomotic leaks on post-operative day 3. The device's technology collected data that an algorithm classified to predict AL. Data were collected for a duration of 3-10 days, while the surgical drain was in place (without affecting routine care). Pilot endpoints were safety and performance analyses: sensitivity and specificity. Results: Fifty patients from 6 medical centers (mean age: 63.6 ± 13.3 years; 38% male) undergoing elective anterior resection (laparoscopic (N = 26), robotic (N = 16), open (N = 8)) for cancer (N = 44), diverticulitis (N = 4), and rectal prolapse (N = 2) were included. Average anastomotic height was 9 ± 5 cm from the anal verge. Grade C ALs were observed in 6.0% (N = 3) of the patients, resulting in increased hospitalization time (6.4 ± 2.4 days with no leak vs. 15.0 ± 7.9 days with Grade C leak). In this N = 50 cohort, the device had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity at POD3 in prediction of Grade C leaks. Given the small number of events (three Grade C leaks, seven leaks overall), these results are preliminary. No device-related serious adverse events were observed, and the standard drain form factor contributed to positive usability feedback. Conclusions: Pilot data suggest that the bioelectric sensing drain device is safe and warrants further evaluation as a potential adjunct for AL detection. The small study sample size and wide confidence intervals for key outcomes require confirmation in a pivotal diagnostic accuracy study with a fixed thresholding algorithm.