MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.10.040

Медицинская библиотека · Medicina clinica · 2016

Tumor lysis syndrome in solid tumors: Clinical characteristics and prognosis.

Caravaca-Fontán Fernando, Martínez-Sáez Olga, Pampa-Saico Saúl, Olmedo Maria Eugenia, Gomis Antonio, Garrido Pilar

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVE

Tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) is an uncommon complication in solid tumors following treatment initiation, and its spontaneous development (STLS) is exceptional. In this study, we analyse the main clinical and prognostic features of a case series with TLS and STLS.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Observational retrospective study in which we included all patients with solid tumours diagnosed with TLS and STLS over a period of 16 years, according to Cairo-Bishop criteria.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in the study (mean age 63±16 years): 10 patients (53%) with TLS, and 9 (47%) STLS. The primary tumour in 8 cases (42%) was lung cancer. All patients had severe renal impairment at the time of diagnosis along with hyperuricemia (16±6mg/dl) and hyperkalemia (6±0.9mmol/l). Despite treatment with intravenous fluids, urinary alkalinisation and rasburicase, 3 patients (16%) required dialysis, and 12 (63%) died during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of TLS in solid tumors is associated with increased mortality and therefore, a high index of suspicion is essential for early diagnosis and treatment initiation.

Для цитирования: Caravaca-Fontán Fernando, Martínez-Sáez Olga, Pampa-Saico Saúl, Olmedo Maria Eugenia, Gomis Antonio, Garrido Pilar. Tumor lysis syndrome in solid tumors: Clinical characteristics and prognosis.. Medicina clinica. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.10.040.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.