Klinicka onkologie : casopis Ceske a Slovenske onkologicke spolecnosti · 2012
[Rhabdoid tumours].
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hao Xiaopei, Dai Kunfu, He Yuting, Tao Lianyuan, Yu Haibo
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic splenectomy plus selective esophagogastric devascularization (LSSD) via the spleen bed for cirrhotic portal hypertension have not been well studied.
AIM: To assess the safety and feasibility of LSSD via the spleen bed for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From June 2012 to December 2017, 423 patients suffering from portal hypertension and hypersplenism with liver cirrhosis underwent surgery in our department. One hundred and sixty-seven of these patients received totally LSSD, and the others received open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (OSD). The characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative details and complications of the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: The operations were successfully performed in all patients. Intraoperative blood loss volume and blood transfusion were similar between the two groups (all p-values > 0.05). Postoperative length of hospital stay and time to oral intake were significantly shorter, but operation time was longer in the LSSD group compared with the OSD group (all p < 0.05). However, postoperative portal vein diameter was significantly smaller in the LSSD group (p < 0.001). The postoperative grade of varices was significantly lower in the LSSD group (p = 0.030). No significant differences were detected between the two groups regarding postoperative liver function, but the incidences of pancreatic leakage, pleural effusion, and wound infections were higher in the OSD group (all p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: LSSD via the spleen bed is safe and feasible for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.
AIM: To assess the safety and feasibility of LSSD via the spleen bed for patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From June 2012 to December 2017, 423 patients suffering from portal hypertension and hypersplenism with liver cirrhosis underwent surgery in our department. One hundred and sixty-seven of these patients received totally LSSD, and the others received open splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization (OSD). The characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative details and complications of the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: The operations were successfully performed in all patients. Intraoperative blood loss volume and blood transfusion were similar between the two groups (all p-values > 0.05). Postoperative length of hospital stay and time to oral intake were significantly shorter, but operation time was longer in the LSSD group compared with the OSD group (all p < 0.05). However, postoperative portal vein diameter was significantly smaller in the LSSD group (p < 0.001). The postoperative grade of varices was significantly lower in the LSSD group (p = 0.030). No significant differences were detected between the two groups regarding postoperative liver function, but the incidences of pancreatic leakage, pleural effusion, and wound infections were higher in the OSD group (all p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: LSSD via the spleen bed is safe and feasible for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.