Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
Noninvasive 3D-CT simulation versus glue injection to localize small pulmonary nodules prior to anatomical segmentectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fu Linhai, Wu Wenbin, Oblokulov Alisherjon, Zhu Ting, Ma Zhifeng, Wang Haiyong, Wu Yuanlin, Li Zhupeng, Yu Guangmao, Zhang Chu, Zhang Miao
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate whether adding glue injection to three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D-CTBA) has extra benefits to facilitate anatomical segmentectomy for pulmonary nodules.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial. The patients undergoing thoracoscopic segmentectomy assisted with 3D-CTBA simulation were enrolled. Then, they were divided into the 3D-CTBA group and the glue-labelling group who received additional computed tomography-guided percutaneous glue (2-octyl cyanoacrylate) injection to label the nodules. The primary outcome was the resection rate of the nodules, and the secondary measures included the operation time, complications and thorax drainage.
RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were randomized into the 3D-CTBA group (89 patients) and glue-labelling group (84 patients) between January 2018 and March 2019. Before the segmentectomy, the patients using glue labelling recorded 5 (6.0%) cases of pneumothorax, 2 (2.4%) cases of haemothorax and 1 (1.2%) case of severe chest pain. All the surgical procedure was performed fluently and safely. The resection rate of the nodules was 100% in both groups. Furthermore, these patients demonstrated similar operation time [(141.5 ± 41.9) vs (142.1 ± 38.9) min], estimated blood loss [(111.3 ± 74.0) vs (106.0 ± 63.8) ml], duration of chest tube duration [(5.1 ± 3.0) vs (5.0 ± 3.5) days] and total drainage volume [(872.3 ± 643.1) vs (826.7 ± 806.0) ml], with a P-value of >0.05 respectively. In addition, 6 (7.1%) patients in the glue-labelling group and 6 (6.7%) patients in the 3D-CTBA group reported air leakage (>5 days) and chylothorax.
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive 3D-CTBA alone is probably sufficient to facilitate anatomical segmentectomy. The additional invasive glue labelling could be avoided in selected patients who undergo intentional segmentectomy.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered under the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR). Identifier: ChiCTR1800018293, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=29345.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial. The patients undergoing thoracoscopic segmentectomy assisted with 3D-CTBA simulation were enrolled. Then, they were divided into the 3D-CTBA group and the glue-labelling group who received additional computed tomography-guided percutaneous glue (2-octyl cyanoacrylate) injection to label the nodules. The primary outcome was the resection rate of the nodules, and the secondary measures included the operation time, complications and thorax drainage.
RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were randomized into the 3D-CTBA group (89 patients) and glue-labelling group (84 patients) between January 2018 and March 2019. Before the segmentectomy, the patients using glue labelling recorded 5 (6.0%) cases of pneumothorax, 2 (2.4%) cases of haemothorax and 1 (1.2%) case of severe chest pain. All the surgical procedure was performed fluently and safely. The resection rate of the nodules was 100% in both groups. Furthermore, these patients demonstrated similar operation time [(141.5 ± 41.9) vs (142.1 ± 38.9) min], estimated blood loss [(111.3 ± 74.0) vs (106.0 ± 63.8) ml], duration of chest tube duration [(5.1 ± 3.0) vs (5.0 ± 3.5) days] and total drainage volume [(872.3 ± 643.1) vs (826.7 ± 806.0) ml], with a P-value of >0.05 respectively. In addition, 6 (7.1%) patients in the glue-labelling group and 6 (6.7%) patients in the 3D-CTBA group reported air leakage (>5 days) and chylothorax.
CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive 3D-CTBA alone is probably sufficient to facilitate anatomical segmentectomy. The additional invasive glue labelling could be avoided in selected patients who undergo intentional segmentectomy.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered under the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR). Identifier: ChiCTR1800018293, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=29345.