MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery · 2020
Wound Care With a Porcine Extracellular Matrix After Surgical Treatment of Rhinophyma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schmitz Lutz, Hessam Schapoor, Scholl Lisa, Reitenbach Sarah, Segert Marc H, Bechara Falk G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Rhinophyma surgery is commonly associated with prolonged wound healing and the need for multiple wound dressings.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical outcome with a porcine extracellular matrix (ECM) after shave excision of rhinophyma compared with common wound care procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with common dressings (CD) compared with patients with additional ECM (OASIS) application. Clinical findings were assessed prior to treatment and at follow-up visit using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and Rhinophyma Severity Index (RHISI).
RESULTS: Overall, 28 patients (67.5 ±9.0 years) with a mean wound area of 33.9 (±8.5) cm² were included. After a mean follow-up period of 132 (±73) days, scales of POSAS, VSS, and RHISI showed significant (P< .0001) reductions of 47.0% (±11.1), 56.0% (±12.0), and 62.3% (±14.3), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences of aforementioned parameters between the ECM group (n= 17) and CD group (n= 11). In contrast, the number of dressing changes were significantly (P< .006) less in the ECM group (1.4 ±0.8) compared with CD group (4.1 ±2.6). The ECM group showed a significant (P< .017) shorter time to re-epithelization (10.5 ±1.7 days) than the CD group (13.1 ±2.2 days).
CONCLUSIONS: The application of porcine ECM is practicable and reduces the number of dressing changes and time to re-epithelization clearly. Crusts are scaling off spontaneously without any aggressive action needed. Our findings indicate that ECM application is a promising approach for rhinophyma wound care.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical outcome with a porcine extracellular matrix (ECM) after shave excision of rhinophyma compared with common wound care procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with common dressings (CD) compared with patients with additional ECM (OASIS) application. Clinical findings were assessed prior to treatment and at follow-up visit using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and Rhinophyma Severity Index (RHISI).
RESULTS: Overall, 28 patients (67.5 ±9.0 years) with a mean wound area of 33.9 (±8.5) cm² were included. After a mean follow-up period of 132 (±73) days, scales of POSAS, VSS, and RHISI showed significant (P< .0001) reductions of 47.0% (±11.1), 56.0% (±12.0), and 62.3% (±14.3), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences of aforementioned parameters between the ECM group (n= 17) and CD group (n= 11). In contrast, the number of dressing changes were significantly (P< .006) less in the ECM group (1.4 ±0.8) compared with CD group (4.1 ±2.6). The ECM group showed a significant (P< .017) shorter time to re-epithelization (10.5 ±1.7 days) than the CD group (13.1 ±2.2 days).
CONCLUSIONS: The application of porcine ECM is practicable and reduces the number of dressing changes and time to re-epithelization clearly. Crusts are scaling off spontaneously without any aggressive action needed. Our findings indicate that ECM application is a promising approach for rhinophyma wound care.