Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
AI to Identify Strain-Sensitive Regions of the Optic Nerve Head Linked to Functional Loss in Glaucoma.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chuangsuwanich Thanadet, Nongpiur Monisha E, Braeu Fabian A, Prasad Shimna Clara, Tun Tin A, Thiéry Alexandre, Perera Shamira, Ho Ching Lin, Buist Martin, Barbastathis George, Aung Tin, Girard Michaël J A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to assess whether optic nerve head (ONH) biomechanics, quantified by tissue strain, improves classification of progressive visual field (VF) loss patterns in glaucoma beyond morphology, and to use saliency maps to identify ONH regions associated with the predictions.
METHODS: We recruited 249 patients with glaucoma (mean age 69 ± 5 years, 54% female patients). One eye per subject was imaged under (1) primary gaze and (2) primary gaze with IOP elevated to approximately 35 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) via ophthalmo-dynamometry. Twelve subjects were excluded due to poor scan quality/limited lamina cribrosa (LC) visibility. Experts classified subjects into four categories based on the presence of specific visual field defects (VFDs): (1) superior nasal step (N = 26), (2) superior partial arcuate (N = 62), (3) full superior hemifield defect (N = 25), and (4) other/non-specific defects (N = 124). Automatic segmentation and digital volume correlation computed neural tissue and LC strains. Biomechanical and structural features were input to a PointNet model. Three classification tasks were performed to detect: (1) superior nasal step, (2) superior partial arcuate, and (3) full superior hemifield defect. Data were split 80/20 (train/test). Area under the curve (AUC) assessed performance. Saliency maps (an explainable artificial intelligence [XAI] technique) highlighted ONH regions most critical to classification.
RESULTS: Models achieved AUCs of 0.77 to 0.88 across VFD classifications. The structure-only model reached an AUC of 0.83 ± 0.02 for superior arcuate defects, which significantly improved to 0.87 ± 0.02 (P < 0.05) with the addition of strain information, demonstrating that ONH biomechanics enhance prediction beyond morphology. Strain-sensitive regions were localized to the inferior and inferotemporal rim, expanding with increasing severity of VF loss.
CONCLUSIONS: ONH strain enhances classification of glaucomatous VF loss patterns. The neuroretinal rim, rather than the LC, was most critical, suggesting rim strain may play a dominant role in axonal injury and functional loss.
METHODS: We recruited 249 patients with glaucoma (mean age 69 ± 5 years, 54% female patients). One eye per subject was imaged under (1) primary gaze and (2) primary gaze with IOP elevated to approximately 35 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) via ophthalmo-dynamometry. Twelve subjects were excluded due to poor scan quality/limited lamina cribrosa (LC) visibility. Experts classified subjects into four categories based on the presence of specific visual field defects (VFDs): (1) superior nasal step (N = 26), (2) superior partial arcuate (N = 62), (3) full superior hemifield defect (N = 25), and (4) other/non-specific defects (N = 124). Automatic segmentation and digital volume correlation computed neural tissue and LC strains. Biomechanical and structural features were input to a PointNet model. Three classification tasks were performed to detect: (1) superior nasal step, (2) superior partial arcuate, and (3) full superior hemifield defect. Data were split 80/20 (train/test). Area under the curve (AUC) assessed performance. Saliency maps (an explainable artificial intelligence [XAI] technique) highlighted ONH regions most critical to classification.
RESULTS: Models achieved AUCs of 0.77 to 0.88 across VFD classifications. The structure-only model reached an AUC of 0.83 ± 0.02 for superior arcuate defects, which significantly improved to 0.87 ± 0.02 (P < 0.05) with the addition of strain information, demonstrating that ONH biomechanics enhance prediction beyond morphology. Strain-sensitive regions were localized to the inferior and inferotemporal rim, expanding with increasing severity of VF loss.
CONCLUSIONS: ONH strain enhances classification of glaucomatous VF loss patterns. The neuroretinal rim, rather than the LC, was most critical, suggesting rim strain may play a dominant role in axonal injury and functional loss.