MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2478/jccm-2019-0014

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2019

Locked-In Syndrome Following Cervical Manipulation by a Chiropractor: A Case Report.

Orsini Guillaume Giordano, Metaxas Giorgios-Emmanouil, Legros Vincent

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Vertebrobasilar occlusion poses difficult diagnostic issues and even when properly diagnosed has a poor prognosis. Newer studies highlight a better outcome when thrombectomy was carried out between six and twenty-four hours after an initial diagnosis of stroke. This paper reports a case where a patient suffered a vertebrobasilar stroke secondary to a traumatic bilateral vertebral arteries dissection was treated with late thrombectomy.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old woman was manipulated on the cervical spinal column by a chiropractor. Following three weeks of cervical pain, she presented with severe aphasia and quadriplegia (NIHSS = 28). An MRI scan indicated ischemia of the vertebrobasilar system. Thirty-one hours after the onset of these symptoms, a thrombectomy was performed. After one month, the patient could move her head and the proximal part of her limbs but remained confined to bed (NIHSS = 13).

CONCLUSION

The current case illustrates the benefit of late mechanical thrombectomy for a posterior cerebral circulation infarct. Although there was a delay in treatment, partial recovery ensued.

Для цитирования: Orsini Guillaume Giordano, Metaxas Giorgios-Emmanouil, Legros Vincent. Locked-In Syndrome Following Cervical Manipulation by a Chiropractor: A Case Report.. Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures). 2019. DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2019-0014.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.