MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.105495

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2026

Cecal Perforation Presenting as Apparent Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Distinguishing Acute Peritonitis From Malignant Mimicry.

Rahming Newton, Daghestani Norah, De Almeida Shinelle, Farhat Imad N, Naresh Mhadhumithaa, Tiesenga Frederick

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cecal perforation is a rare but life-threatening surgical emergency that may present with radiologic and intraoperative findings highly suggestive of peritoneal carcinomatosis. This overlap may create substantial diagnostic uncertainty, particularly in patients with systemic symptoms such as weight loss, anemia, and ascites. We report the case of a 39-year-old male patient who presented with sepsis, abdominal pain, and computed tomography (CT) findings concerning for carcinomatosis, including ascites and mesenteric nodularity. Exploratory laparotomy revealed diffuse fibrinous exudates and peritoneal studding highly suspicious for malignant dissemination. However, histopathologic evaluation of peritoneal, mesenteric, omental, and cecectomy specimens demonstrated only acute and chronic inflammation, focal fat necrosis, abscess formation, granulation tissue, and reactive mesothelial changes, with no evidence of dysplasia or malignancy. This case highlights the diagnostic challenge posed by inflammatory mimics of carcinomatosis and underscores the essential role of histopathology in guiding management in complex abdominal emergencies.

Для цитирования: Rahming Newton, Daghestani Norah, De Almeida Shinelle, Farhat Imad N, Naresh Mhadhumithaa, Tiesenga Frederick. Cecal Perforation Presenting as Apparent Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Distinguishing Acute Peritonitis From Malignant Mimicry.. Cureus. 2026. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.105495.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.