MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00016480701840106

Медицинская библиотека · Acta oto-laryngologica · 2008

Algorithm for evaluation of pulsatile tinnitus.

Mattox Douglas E, Hudgins Patricia

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

CONCLUSIONS

Pulsatile tinnitus requires a careful physical examination and evaluation with selected imaging techniques to identify the origin of the symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of identifiable anomalies in patients with pulsatile tinnitus.

SUBJECTS AND

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review undertaken in a tertiary care center. Patients seen in the outpatient otolaryngology clinic with the chief complaint of pulsatile tinnitus were evaluated by physical examination and imaging including CT angiography. The outcome measure was the incidence of identifiable abnormalities on imaging studies.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were seen between January 2002 and June 2007 with the chief complaint of constant pulsatile tinnitus, excluding those with chemodectomas. On the basis of physical examination and imaging, 14 were considered arterial, 23 venous, and 15 were indeterminate in origin. Among patients with venous tinnitus, sigmoid sinus diverticulum was the most common finding. Among patients with arterial tinnitus, carotid atherosclerotic disease was the most common. One patient had erosion of the cochlea by the carotid artery. Non-vascular entities identified include superior semicircular canal dehiscence and benign intracranial hypertension.

Для цитирования: Mattox Douglas E, Hudgins Patricia. Algorithm for evaluation of pulsatile tinnitus.. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2008. DOI: 10.1080/00016480701840106.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.