m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Clinical & experimental optometry · 2021

Evaluation of the presence of a central fusion lock effect on fixation disparity curve parameters in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Mirzaeian Maryam, Hashemi Hassan, Narooie-Noori Foroozan, Nabovati Payam, Yekta Abbasali, Sardari Sara, Ostadimoghaddam Hadi, Doostdar Asgar, Khabazkhoob Mehdi

Аннотация

Clinical relevance: Several parameters are likely to affect the magnitude of fixation disparity (FD) and FD curve characteristics. Presence of a central fusion lock may have an important effect on clinical testing of FD and interpretation of its results.Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate FD curve parameters using the modified near Mallett unit (with a central fusion lock) and the Sheedy disparometer (without a central fusion lock) in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 147 patients with a mean age of 22.5 years who presented to the optometry clinic of Paramedical College of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The symptoms were recorded in a questionnaire for each patient. FD was measured using the modified near Mallett unit and Sheedy disparometer and FD curves were generated using the AutoCAD 2005 software.Results: There was a significant difference in the FD, associated phoria, and slope measurements between the two devices (all p values < 0.05). Significant difference was found in the mean FD between symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects using the modified near Mallett unit (p < 0.0001) and Sheey disparometer (p = 0.007). In symptomatic subjects, the mean slope was steeper for the modified near Mallett unit compared to the Sheedy disparometer (p = 0.001). Although the mean centre of symmetry was more negative in the modified near Mallett unit versus the Sheedy disparometer, the difference between the instruments was not significant in symptomatic (p = 0.477) and asymptomatic (p = 0.257) participants.Conclusion: There are differences in the FD curve parameters between the modified near Mallett unit and Sheedy disparometer. Slope is a proper criterion for differentiating asymptomatic subjects from symptomatic individuals. The modified near Mallett unit is a more precise tool for assessment of non-compensated heterophoria compared to the Sheedy disparometer.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты