PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025
Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury treated in emergency departments in the United States: 2006 to 2020.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Paul Axler Jean, Alvarez Elsa, Marcet Julian, Hamm McKenna, Gartner Kelly, Kaelin Darryl, Castillo Camilo, Ugiliweneza Beatrice
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain health challenges with devastating biopsychological and socioeconomic consequences. The occurrence of dual diagnosis is a significant but poorly reported issue in U.S. emergency departments (EDs).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trend, demographic, and socioeconomic aspects of dual diagnosis compared to isolated TSCI and TBI.
DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Nationwide Emergency Departments Sample, 2006-2020.
PARTICIPANTS: Data were extracted on number of ED visits nationwide by patients over 18 years of age with TBI, TSCI, and dual diagnoses based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. From 2006 to 2020, there were 23,826,719 TBI and TSCI related visits to EDs nationwide. Of these, 68,578 were dual diagnoses (TSCI+TBI), 23,579,060 were isolated TBIs, and 356,562 were isolated TSCIs.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trend analysis of dual diagnoses, TBI (mild, moderate, severe), and TSCI (cervical, thoracic, lumbar/sacral/cauda equina). Demographics including gender, age, income quartile, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were compared between TSCI+TBI, TBI alone, and TSCI alone.
RESULTS: There was an increase of 201 dual diagnosis ED visits per year from 2012 onwards and an increase of 465 TSCI ED visits per year from 2017. However, TBIs declined from 2014 onwards, following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's reclassification of unspecified TBI. Patients with dual diagnosis had a median age of 50 years and were predominantly male. Private insurance (TSCI+TBI: 39%; TBI: 32%; TSCI: 27%) was the most used by patients with dual diagnosis, although 29% (vs. TBI: 27%; TSCI: 32%) were in the lowest income quartiles. Most reported ED visits were in the southern United States, and most were at university hospitals. Importantly, patients treated at level 1 trauma hospitals were primarily dual diagnosis (48%).
CONCLUSION: TSCI alone and dual diagnosis visits are rising nationally in EDs; these patients have higher morbidity rates and may require more specialized care. These patients are among the most vulnerable socioeconomically. The increase in ED visits among these populations underscores the need for adequate and sufficient outpatient care to support their ongoing treatment and recovery.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the trend, demographic, and socioeconomic aspects of dual diagnosis compared to isolated TSCI and TBI.
DESIGN: Observational cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Nationwide Emergency Departments Sample, 2006-2020.
PARTICIPANTS: Data were extracted on number of ED visits nationwide by patients over 18 years of age with TBI, TSCI, and dual diagnoses based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. From 2006 to 2020, there were 23,826,719 TBI and TSCI related visits to EDs nationwide. Of these, 68,578 were dual diagnoses (TSCI+TBI), 23,579,060 were isolated TBIs, and 356,562 were isolated TSCIs.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trend analysis of dual diagnoses, TBI (mild, moderate, severe), and TSCI (cervical, thoracic, lumbar/sacral/cauda equina). Demographics including gender, age, income quartile, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics were compared between TSCI+TBI, TBI alone, and TSCI alone.
RESULTS: There was an increase of 201 dual diagnosis ED visits per year from 2012 onwards and an increase of 465 TSCI ED visits per year from 2017. However, TBIs declined from 2014 onwards, following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's reclassification of unspecified TBI. Patients with dual diagnosis had a median age of 50 years and were predominantly male. Private insurance (TSCI+TBI: 39%; TBI: 32%; TSCI: 27%) was the most used by patients with dual diagnosis, although 29% (vs. TBI: 27%; TSCI: 32%) were in the lowest income quartiles. Most reported ED visits were in the southern United States, and most were at university hospitals. Importantly, patients treated at level 1 trauma hospitals were primarily dual diagnosis (48%).
CONCLUSION: TSCI alone and dual diagnosis visits are rising nationally in EDs; these patients have higher morbidity rates and may require more specialized care. These patients are among the most vulnerable socioeconomically. The increase in ED visits among these populations underscores the need for adequate and sufficient outpatient care to support their ongoing treatment and recovery.