DOI 10.1038/s41416-026-03589-6
Strategic roadmap for delivery of clinical trials in rare childhood central nervous system (CNS) tumours: a multi-stakeholder consensus.
Аннотация
Rare paediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumours comprise a biologically-heterogeneous group of low-incidence diseases that present significant challenges to both therapeutic development and clinical research, limiting the availability of high-quality evidence to guide clinical care. The UK3CR Children's Cancer Research Group (CRG) CNS Tumours Subgroup convened a multidisciplinary workshop to identify research priorities and establish a strategic framework for advancing clinical trials in this setting. Four high-priority tumour groups-craniopharyngioma, choroid plexus carcinoma (CPC), very high-risk medulloblastoma (VHR-MB), and rare embryonal and sarcomatous tumours (REST), including embryonal tumour with multilayered rosettes (ETMR)-were evaluated. Key outcomes included the feasibility of a UK-led craniopharyngioma trial, the need for enhanced national CPC data collection, and support for European early-phase platform trials in VHR-MB. REST highlighted transnational regulatory complexity requiring coordinated registries and parallel trial models. Cross-cutting barriers included regulatory discordance, contracting delays, fragmented funding, pharmacovigilance differences, data-sharing constraints, and interoperable infrastructures. The workshop emphasised innovative methodologies, including Bayesian/adaptive designs, platform trials, and external control arms, to maximise efficiency in small populations, alongside strengthened patient involvement and international collaboration. Collectively, these findings define a collaborative and internationally-aligned strategic roadmap to accelerate clinical research and improve outcomes in rare paediatric CNS tumours.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.