MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09603123.2010.484861

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of environmental health research · 2010

The prevalence of tinea pedis and tinea manuum in adults in rural areas in Turkey.

Kiraz Nuri, Metintas Selma, Oz Yasemin, Koc Filiz, Koku Aksu Esra Ayse, Kalyoncu Cemalettin, Kasifoglu Nilgun, Cetin Esin, Arikan Inci

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of tinea pedis and manuum (dermatophyte infections of the hands and feet) in adults in rural areas of Turkey, the risk factors and self-administered treatment options. A total of 2,574 people living in a rural area were enrolled in the study. Participants were asked demographic data, hygienic habits in a questionnaire. KOH preparations and culture were performed from suspicious lesions. Medical and alternative therapy methods and former dermatophytosis diagnosis history were taken from the respondents with suspicious lesions. Microbiological samples were taken from 285 (11.1%) participants. Culture was positive in 109 (4.2%) of those. The most common agent was Trichophyton rubrum. The predisposing factors were found as age older than 40, male gender and obesity. Forty-nine (44.9%) of patients had taken a medical therapy, 56 (51.4%) had performed non-medical methods (cologne, Lawsonia inermis-Henna and softener creams). Patient's education about the treatment compliance is important.

Для цитирования: Kiraz Nuri, Metintas Selma, Oz Yasemin, Koc Filiz, Koku Aksu Esra Ayse, Kalyoncu Cemalettin, Kasifoglu Nilgun, Cetin Esin, Arikan Inci. The prevalence of tinea pedis and tinea manuum in adults in rural areas in Turkey.. International journal of environmental health research. 2010. DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2010.484861.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.