The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2026
Rising suspicion, stable disease: an 8-year analysis of suspected and confirmed cauda equina syndrome.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Najjar Elie, Khan Shahbaz, Masarwa Rawan, D'Aquino Daniel, Grevitt Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Suspected cauda equina syndrome (CES) referral pathways are designed to maximise sensitivity, often prompting urgent MRI based on single red-flag features. Rising referral volumes have raised concern that pathway-driven behaviour may not reflect true disease incidence. Longitudinal analyses anchored to robust diagnostic adjudication remain limited.
PURPOSE: To evaluate temporal trends in suspected CES referrals over 8 years within a regional tertiary spinal service, using multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinico-radiological consensus as the diagnostic gold standard.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective observational cohort study at a regional tertiary spinal centre.
PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive adult patients referred with suspected CES between 2016 and 2023.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Confirmed CES (CES+) based on MDT consensus; referral volume, red-flag prevalence, objective bladder metrics, and diagnostic yield.
METHODS: Temporal trends were analysed across the study period. Objective urinary retention was defined as postvoid residual (PVR) >200 mL or catheterisation at presentation.
RESULTS: A total of 1,188 referrals were included, of which 163 (13.7%) were confirmed as CES+. Referral volume increased significantly over time (p<.001) with substantial inter-annual variability, whereas confirmed CES incidence and demographic characteristics remained stable. The prevalence of individual red-flag features showed no consistent directional change, and diagnostic yield did not improve over time. Measured bladder volumes (prevoid>500 mL and PVR>200 mL) declined significantly (p=.0165 and p=.0238, respectively); however, composite objective urinary retention demonstrated no significant linear trend (p=.120). Among confirmed CES+ cases, symptom profiles varied nondirectionally across years, and objective urinary retention remained a common feature.
CONCLUSIONS: MDT-confirmed CES demonstrates epidemiologic and phenotypic stability despite substantial fluctuation in suspected referral activity. Referral volume appears highly sensitive to pathway structure and system-level factors and should not be interpreted as a surrogate for disease incidence. Declining bladder volumes do not indicate earlier detection, and CES remains a heterogeneous neurological syndrome not defined by isolated red-flag features.
PURPOSE: To evaluate temporal trends in suspected CES referrals over 8 years within a regional tertiary spinal service, using multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinico-radiological consensus as the diagnostic gold standard.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective observational cohort study at a regional tertiary spinal centre.
PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive adult patients referred with suspected CES between 2016 and 2023.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Confirmed CES (CES+) based on MDT consensus; referral volume, red-flag prevalence, objective bladder metrics, and diagnostic yield.
METHODS: Temporal trends were analysed across the study period. Objective urinary retention was defined as postvoid residual (PVR) >200 mL or catheterisation at presentation.
RESULTS: A total of 1,188 referrals were included, of which 163 (13.7%) were confirmed as CES+. Referral volume increased significantly over time (p<.001) with substantial inter-annual variability, whereas confirmed CES incidence and demographic characteristics remained stable. The prevalence of individual red-flag features showed no consistent directional change, and diagnostic yield did not improve over time. Measured bladder volumes (prevoid>500 mL and PVR>200 mL) declined significantly (p=.0165 and p=.0238, respectively); however, composite objective urinary retention demonstrated no significant linear trend (p=.120). Among confirmed CES+ cases, symptom profiles varied nondirectionally across years, and objective urinary retention remained a common feature.
CONCLUSIONS: MDT-confirmed CES demonstrates epidemiologic and phenotypic stability despite substantial fluctuation in suspected referral activity. Referral volume appears highly sensitive to pathway structure and system-level factors and should not be interpreted as a surrogate for disease incidence. Declining bladder volumes do not indicate earlier detection, and CES remains a heterogeneous neurological syndrome not defined by isolated red-flag features.