MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0022215120001978

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of laryngology and otology · 2020

Over-under cartilage tympanoplasty: technique, results and a call for improved reporting.

Erbele I D, Fink M R, Mankekar G, Son L S, Mehta R, Arriaga M A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the microscopic over-under cartilage tympanoplasty technique, provide hearing results and detail clinically significant complications.

METHOD: This was a retrospective case series chart review study of over-under cartilage tympanoplasty procedures performed by the senior author between January 2015 and January 2019 at three tertiary care centres. Cases were excluded for previous or intra-operative cholesteatoma, if a mastoidectomy was performed during the procedure or if ossiculoplasty was performed. Hearing results and complications were obtained.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight tympanoplasty procedures met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 13 years (range, 3-71 years). The mean improvement in pure tone average was 6 dB (95 per cent confidence interval 4-9 dB; p < 0.0001). The overall perforation closure rate was 97 per cent (n = 66). Revision surgery was recommended for a total of 6 cases (9 per cent) including 2 post-operative perforations, 1 case of middle-ear cholesteatoma and 3 cases of external auditory canal scarring.

CONCLUSION

Over-under cartilage tympanoplasty is effective at improving clinically meaningful hearing with a low rate of post-operative complications.

Для цитирования: Erbele I D, Fink M R, Mankekar G, Son L S, Mehta R, Arriaga M A. Over-under cartilage tympanoplasty: technique, results and a call for improved reporting.. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 2020. DOI: 10.1017/s0022215120001978.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.