Deep phenotyping of frontal lobe epilepsy compared to other epilepsy syndromes.

AIMS: Frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) is understudied and often misdiagnosed. We sought to comprehensively phenotype FLE and to differentiate FLE from other focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of 1078 cases of confirmed epilepsy in a tertiary neurology centre in London. Data sources were electronic health records, investigation reports and clinical letters.

RESULTS

166 patients had FLE based on clinical findings and investigations-97 with identifiable electroencephalography (EEG) foci in frontal areas (definite FLE), while 69 had no frontal EEG foci (probable FLE). Apart from EEG findings, probable and definite FLE did not differ in other features. FLE was distinct from generalized epilepsy, which tended to present with tonic-clonic seizures and be due to genetic causes. FLE and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) both featured focal unaware seizures and underlying structural or metabolic aetiology. FLE, TLE and generalized epilepsy differed in their EEG (P = 0.0003) and MRI (P = 0.002) findings, where FLE had a higher rate of normal EEG and abnormal MRI findings compared to TLE.

CONCLUSIONS

EEG is often normal for FLE, and abnormalities are commonly identified with MRI. There was no difference in the clinical features of definite and probable FLE, suggesting they represent the same clinical entity. The diagnosis of FLE can be made even when scalp EEG is normal. This large medical cohort provides hallmark features of FLE that differentiate it from TLE and other epilepsy syndromes.