MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00115-008-2562-7

Медицинская библиотека · Der Nervenarzt · 2008

[Sadistic fetishism--deadly passion. Forensic psychiatric assessment of sex offenders].

Nedopil N, Blümcke I, Bock H, Bogerts B, Born C, Stübner S

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This article reviews current developments in psychiatric assessment of sex offenders for criminal courts. These developments are characterized by constantly changing laws and increasing neurobiological findings about paraphilias. Psychiatrists must prepare their reports taking into account the tension between psychopathological, neurobiological, and normative aspects of their judgement. The complexity of such assessments can best be demonstrated by narratives. This narrative concerns a 47-year-old patient who killed eight women after strangling them and masturbating or having intercourse with the unconscious victims. He explained in detail six of these crimes and gave ample information about his history, sexual development, fantasies, and a number of other sexual crimes he had committed. From this information a plausible explanation of his development to sexual fetishism and from there to sadism could be derived. Brain MRI displayed gliotic scars in the frontal lobe and right hippocampus. Consequences of the various findings on psychiatric assessment of legal culpability are discussed in this paper, concluding that a differentiated approach to the assessment is possible only from a psychopathological point of view in which behaviour, clinical features, and motivations are analysed.

Для цитирования: Nedopil N, Blümcke I, Bock H, Bogerts B, Born C, Stübner S. [Sadistic fetishism--deadly passion. Forensic psychiatric assessment of sex offenders].. Der Nervenarzt. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00115-008-2562-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.