DOI 10.1097/rc9.0000000000000643
Management of carotid body tumors: a retrospective multicenter study and case series.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are clinically important in head and neck surgery. In this multicenter retrospective study, we aimed to examine the characteristics, diagnosis, and management of patients diagnosed with CBTs at three institutions.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Patient demographics, clinical symptoms, investigative modalities, therapeutic interventions, pathological findings, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Overall, 12 patients, with a median age of 51.5 years, were evaluated.
RESULTS
The most common symptom was a painless neck mass (83.3%). Tumors were located on the right side in eight patients (66.6%). No bilateral cases were recorded. One patient had a synchronous small glomus vagale tumor. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography was used as the primary imaging modality in 11 patients. Multiple imaging modalities were used in 66.6% of patients. The median tumor size was 4.6 cm. Of these, 33.3% were Shamblin Class I, 50% Class II, and 16.6% Class III. Seven patients underwent surgery, whereas five opted for non-surgical treatment. Complications, including hoarseness and dysphagia, occurred in three patients. Preoperative embolization was performed in two patients. All operated cases were histopathologically confirmed to be paragangliomas.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results revealed that, although CBTs are rare and challenging to treat, positive outcomes are possible with careful planning and precise surgery. Active surveillance may be a suitable initial approach in selected patients. Future studies should focus on creating individualized risk plans to guide treatment decisions and follow-ups.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.