Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2026
Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Psychosocial Research for Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Firman Kirsty, Bigham Katie, Saville Christopher, Burnside Elizabeth
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: People with intellectual disabilities often experience challenges to participation in psychosocial research. This review examined the barriers and facilitators affecting their participation.
METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Databases searched included: PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. A narrative synthesis structured using the Socio-Ecological Model, considering levels of influence-intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy-was used.
RESULTS: There were specific and shared barriers and facilitators for different levels of influence involved in psychosocial research. Contradictions between levels of influence, including beliefs about attitudes, views around harms, and the use of incentives, are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The importance of targeting levels of influence utilising different methods to improve the participation of adults with intellectual disabilities in psychosocial research is highlighted.
METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Databases searched included: PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. A narrative synthesis structured using the Socio-Ecological Model, considering levels of influence-intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional, community, and policy-was used.
RESULTS: There were specific and shared barriers and facilitators for different levels of influence involved in psychosocial research. Contradictions between levels of influence, including beliefs about attitudes, views around harms, and the use of incentives, are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The importance of targeting levels of influence utilising different methods to improve the participation of adults with intellectual disabilities in psychosocial research is highlighted.