British journal of haematology · 2026
Enhanced prognosis of acute myeloid leukaemia patients with dmCEBPAbZIP -inf mutations: Insights from a multicentre Chinese cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Guanghui, Shi Pengcheng, Dou Liping, Ren Jinhai, Zhang Hongyu, Jiang Qian, Jiang Hao, Xu Lanping, Zhang Xiaohui, Huang Xiaojun, Chen Suning, Tang Feifei
Аннотация
The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendation redefined favourable-risk CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA)-mutated acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) by in-frame C-terminal basic leucine zipper domain (bZIP) mutations rather than double CEBPA mutations. We analysed 411 CEBPA-mutated AML patients from six Chinese centres, classified as single-mutant CEBPAbZIP-other (smCEBPAbZIP-other; n = 38), smCEBPAbZIP-inf (n = 39), double-mutant CEBPAother (dmCEBPAother; n = 37) and dmCEBPAbZIP-inf (n = 297). DmCEBPAbZIP-inf patients were younger, had more de novo AML and showed distinct co-mutation profiles, with more GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2) and fewer nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1)/DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A) mutations. Additionally, dmCEBPAbZIP-inf patients had a higher composite complete remission (CRc) rate (94.6% vs. 84.2%-89.2%, p = 0.025) and better survival than the other three groups (3-year overall survival [OS]: 80.0% vs. 57.4%-70.6%, p < 0.001; 3-year disease-free survival [DFS]: 74.5% vs. 45.4%-67.9%, p = 0.002). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that dmCEBPAbZIP-inf and smCEBPAbZIP-inf had comparable survival, whereas dmCEBPAbZIP-inf had better survival than smCEBPAbZIP-other and dmCEBPAother. However, among intensively treated patients, dmCEBPAbZIP-inf was associated with superior survival compared with smCEBPAbZIP-inf (OS, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.542, p = 0.017; DFS, HR = 1.618, p = 0.014) and other two CEBPA groups in multivariable models. Among dmCEBPAbZIP-inf patients, intensive chemotherapy (HR = 0.51, p = 0.012), adverse karyotype (HR = 1.52, p = 0.037), age ≥50 years (HR = 1.74, p = 0.044), neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) (HR = 1.64, p = 0.014) and colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor (CSF3R) mutation (HR = 1.78, p = 0.049) were independent factors for OS. No significant difference in survival was observed between patients with CEBPAbZIP-indel and CEBPbZIP-ms mutations. In conclusion, the dmCEBPAbZIP-inf subgroup displayed unique co-mutation gene spectra and had better prognoses among the intensive treated cohort.