Muscle & nerve · 2023
Recurrent laryngeal motor nerve conduction studies in a rat model: Establishing an objective measure for investigating laryngeal innervation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baertsch Hans, Cvancara David J, Paniello Randal C, Hillel Allen D, Bhatt Neel K
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Disease or injury can cause neuromuscular changes to the larynx that can affect voice, breathing, and swallowing. Motor nerve conduction studies have had limited use in the study of laryngeal neurophysiology, despite their importance in other anatomic sites. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of performing recurrent laryngeal motor nerve conduction studies (rlMNCS) in a rat model.
METHODS: rlMNCS were performed in 15 rats under anesthesia. A bipolar stimulating electrode was placed on the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) 5 mm below the cricoid cartilage. Via direct laryngoscopy, a recording electrode was placed transorally into the thyroarytenoid muscle. The RLN was maximally stimulated to determine the compound muscle action potential (CMAP). Three consecutive trials were averaged.
RESULTS: The mean stimulating threshold to the RLN to achieve a CMAP from the thyroarytenoid was 1.7 ± 0.6 mA. RLN stimulation caused a visible adductor twitch of the vocal fold in all animals. The mean negative amplitude was 2.0 ± 0.8 mV, and the total area was 1.0 ± 0.4 mV ms. The CMAP latency and negative duration were 1.0 ± 0.1 ms and 0.9 ± 0.2 ms, respectively.
DISCUSSION: rlMNCS are feasible and may be useful in understanding laryngeal neurophysiology with disease or injury. This work could provide a tractable animal model for studying and monitoring treatment of neuromuscular conditions affecting voice, breathing, and swallowing.
METHODS: rlMNCS were performed in 15 rats under anesthesia. A bipolar stimulating electrode was placed on the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) 5 mm below the cricoid cartilage. Via direct laryngoscopy, a recording electrode was placed transorally into the thyroarytenoid muscle. The RLN was maximally stimulated to determine the compound muscle action potential (CMAP). Three consecutive trials were averaged.
RESULTS: The mean stimulating threshold to the RLN to achieve a CMAP from the thyroarytenoid was 1.7 ± 0.6 mA. RLN stimulation caused a visible adductor twitch of the vocal fold in all animals. The mean negative amplitude was 2.0 ± 0.8 mV, and the total area was 1.0 ± 0.4 mV ms. The CMAP latency and negative duration were 1.0 ± 0.1 ms and 0.9 ± 0.2 ms, respectively.
DISCUSSION: rlMNCS are feasible and may be useful in understanding laryngeal neurophysiology with disease or injury. This work could provide a tractable animal model for studying and monitoring treatment of neuromuscular conditions affecting voice, breathing, and swallowing.