Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID · 2026
The development and initial evaluation of a forensic community team for people with an intellectual disability.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chester Verity, Clarke Sadie, Patteril Elizabeth, Alger Nadine, Smith Andy, Farrar Oliver, Flowerdew Ruth, Boughey Daniel, Freeman Charlie, Weeks Carly, Lakin Donna, Large Julia, Alexander Regi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Policy initiatives emphasise the need for forensic community intellectual disability teams to reduce avoidable admissions and facilitate timely discharges from inpatient forensic services. These teams provide specialist risk assessment, psychiatric management, and rehabilitation for individuals with intellectual disabilities who have offended or are at risk of offending.
AIMS: This paper describes the development and initial evaluation of a Forensic Community Intellectual Disability team in Norfolk.
METHODS: A retrospective case-note review examined sociodemographic, clinical, and forensic characteristics of 58 patients managed in the first year. A clinical consensus method estimated avoided admissions.
RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male, White British, mean age 37, with high rates of autism, mental illness, substance misuse, and self-harm risk. Common offences included violence, property, and sexual offences. Interventions resulted in 15 avoided hospital admissions.
CONCLUSIONS: The team demonstrated that tailored community-based care can effectively manage forensic needs and reduce reliance on inpatient services.
AIMS: This paper describes the development and initial evaluation of a Forensic Community Intellectual Disability team in Norfolk.
METHODS: A retrospective case-note review examined sociodemographic, clinical, and forensic characteristics of 58 patients managed in the first year. A clinical consensus method estimated avoided admissions.
RESULTS: Patients were predominantly male, White British, mean age 37, with high rates of autism, mental illness, substance misuse, and self-harm risk. Common offences included violence, property, and sexual offences. Interventions resulted in 15 avoided hospital admissions.
CONCLUSIONS: The team demonstrated that tailored community-based care can effectively manage forensic needs and reduce reliance on inpatient services.